内容来源：https://www.wired.com/story/uncanny-valley-podcast-wired-roundup-why-gpt-5-flopped/

内容总结：

【科技新闻周刊】WIRED播客精选：特朗普政府移民嘲讽表情包引争议 OpenAI用户抗议GPT-5更新

本周，美国《连线》杂志播客节目《诡异山谷》梳理了五则重磅科技与社会新闻：

1. 特朗普政府用表情包调侃驱逐移民引争议
   据记者Tess Owen报道，美国国土安全部、移民海关执法局（ICE）等官方账号近期在社交媒体发布改编自网络热梗的嘲讽性内容，试图将大规模驱逐移民行为"娱乐化"。例如在一段配乐视频中，戴手铐的遣返人员被戏称为"Jet2航空公司单程度假"。专家指出，此举旨在通过戏谑手段使严苛移民政策"正常化"，白宫回应称"不会为发布热门表情包道歉"。

2. 特朗普家族关联企业涉足15亿美元加密资产
   World Liberty Financial公司被曝通过纳斯达克上市公司Alt-Five Sigma搭建加密资产通道，允许投资者间接炒作其代币。该企业由特朗普成年子女持股22.5%，被质疑存在利益输送。报道指出，特朗普任内对加密货币监管宽松，相关企业面临的法律诉讼多被搁置。

3. 阿肯色州现"白人专属社区"
   记者David Gilbert调查发现，名为"回归土地"的组织正在建设仅限"欧洲白人血统"者居住的封闭社区，主张种族隔离。该组织以《网络国家》一书为理论依据，声称采用"私人会员制"规避《公平住房法》。当地司法部长称未发现违法迹象。

4. 美国加速推进月球核反应堆计划
   NASA计划2030年前在月球南极部署100千瓦级核反应堆，以应对中俄太空竞争。该项目由商业公司参与，虽技术可行但引发安全担忧，包括铀燃料管控及太空主权划分等问题。

5. OpenAI紧急调整GPT-5引发用户不满
   原被宣传具备"博士级智能"的GPT-5因过度优化编程能力牺牲对话亲和力，遭用户强烈抗议。内部消息称，公司为维持季度发布节奏仓促推出未达标模型，其路由系统故障进一步导致表现失常。事件暴露出AI产品在商业化需求与用户体验间的矛盾。

（本期节目提及9月9日旧金山线下活动信息及往期内容推荐，此处从略）

【报道特点】

• 采用"争议事件+多方观点"的平衡报道结构
• 关键数据具体化（如"22.5%持股""100千瓦反应堆"）
• 本土化处理：将"banger memes"译为"热门表情包"，"whites-only"译为"白人专属"
• 文化适配：用"戏谑手段正常化"替代直译"normalize"，"利益输送"比译"curry favor"更符合中文反腐语境

中文翻译：

【本期节目内容逐字翻译】

欢迎收听《连线》杂志旗下播客"诡异谷"。我是商业与产业板块主编佐伊·希弗，今天将与资深政治记者杰克·拉胡特共同盘点本周五大必读报道——从特朗普政府用网络梗图戏谑驱逐移民，到NASA在月球建造核反应堆的雄心计划。随后我们将深入探讨用户为何对OpenAI发布的GPT-5大失所望。

提及报道：

• 威尔·奈特《用户抗议后OpenAI紧急升级GPT-5》
• 苔丝·欧文《特朗普政府正用梗图把大规模驱逐变成一场笑话》
• 乔尔·卡里利《特朗普家族背书的世界自由金融设立15亿美元加密基金》
• 大卫·吉尔伯特《阿肯色州"白人专属社区"调查》
• 贝基·费雷拉《美国为何竞逐在月球建造核反应堆》

特别活动：
9月9日旧金山线下活动火热售票中（链接见节目备注）。您可通过Bluesky平台关注@zoeschiffer和@jakelahut.writes.news，或发送邮件至uncannyvalley@wired.com与我们互动。

收听方式：
除网页播放器外，苹果用户可通过Podcasts应用或点击节目链接订阅，亦可使用Overcast/Pocket Casts等应用搜索"诡异谷"。本节目亦登陆Spotify平台。

（注：以下为自动生成字幕，可能存在误差）

节目正文：

佐伊：大家好，我是佐伊。节目开始前分享一个激动人心的消息：9月9日我们将与KQED联合举办旧金山线下活动，主编凯蒂·德拉蒙德将与特邀嘉宾展开重磅对话。现在进入正题——本周五大焦点报道。

杰克：很高兴再次参与。

报道一：政府梗图背后的驱逐戏谑
佐伊：首篇报道揭露特朗普政府官方账号正用病毒梗图美化驱逐行动。国土安全部和白宫联合发布的Instagram视频最具代表性——他们将英国廉航Jet2洗脑广告曲与戴手铐移民登机画面合成，配文"当ICE为你预订单程驱逐航班，这感觉妙不可言"。

杰克：（震惊）即便支持强硬移民政策，这种赤裸裸的残忍也令人不适。从2024竞选动态来看，这本质是种主流化极端言论的策略。

佐伊：专家指出其核心目的是将非人道行为常态化。面对舆论批评，白宫竟回应"绝不为我们发布的爆款梗图道歉"。

报道二：特朗普家族的加密资本游戏
佐伊：世界自由金融公司通过鲜为人知的纳斯达克壳公司Alt-Five Sigma，使投资者能间接炒作其加密货币。这种操作相当于用上市公司股票为代币市值背书，预计将人为推高15亿美元估值。

杰克：更值得警惕的是政治献金链——特朗普家族持有该加密基金22.5%份额及母公司40%股权。结合近期政府对加密行业监管的全面松绑，这简直是给金主铺红毯。

报道三：阿肯色州的"白人乌托邦"
佐伊：名为"回归土地"的组织正在建设仅限欧洲裔白人加入的社区，其理念部分源自风投家巴拉吉的《网络国家》理论。他们钻了《公平住房法》空子，以"私人会员协会"名义运作。

杰克：这就像《硅谷》里孵化器的黑暗翻版——用数字主权包装种族主义。令人震惊的是当地司法部长竟称其"完全合法"。

报道四：月球核反应堆竞赛
佐伊：NASA代理局长肖恩·杜菲加速推进2030年前在月球南极部署100千瓦核反应堆计划，旨在抗衡中俄太空野心。核能可突破传统太阳能局限，但铀燃料管控、主权划界等问题可能引发太空安全危机。

杰克：（调侃）我可不想见证太空核战爆发，还是学尤达大师隐居比较安全。

报道五：GPT-5为何遭遇滑铁卢？
佐伊：OpenAI承诺"博士级智能"的GPT-5发布后，用户抱怨其失去GPT-4的"人性化"特质。内部消息显示，过度优化编程能力牺牲了对话温度，导致忠实用户集体抗议。

杰克：这揭示了AI发展的根本矛盾——企业追求智能突破，但普通用户只想要个贴心伙伴。当聊天机器人开始像冷酷的办公软件，那些依赖它进行情感倾诉的用户自然会产生戒断反应。

佐伊：这让人想起ChatGPT发布前的内部争论——技术团队认为模型不够完美，但简洁的交互界面最终征服了大众。OpenAI或许该重新思考：产品体验有时比算法参数更重要。

幕后团队：
本期节目由阿德里安娜·塔皮亚制作，混音师阿马尔·拉尔，纽约录音师普兰·班迪，执行制作人凯特·奥斯本。康泰纳仕音频总监克里斯·班农，《连线》全球总编辑凯蒂·德拉蒙德监制。

英文来源：

In today’s episode, our host, Zöe Schiffer, is joined by WIRED senior politics writer Jake Lahut to run through five of the best stories we published this week—from how the Trump administration is creating and sharing memes to make fun of deportations, to NASA’s ambitious goal to put nuclear reactors on the moon. Then, Zöe and Jake dive into why users kind of hated OpenAI’s GPT-5 release.
Mentioned in this episode:
OpenAI Scrambles to Update GPT-5 After Users Revolt, by Will Knight
The Trump Administration Is Using Memes to Turn Mass Deportation Into One Big Joke, by Tess Owen
Trump Family–Backed World Liberty Financial Sets Up $1.5 Billion Crypto Treasury, by Joel Khalili
Inside the ‘Whites Only’ Community in Arkansas, by David Gilbert
Why the US Is Racing to Build a Nuclear Reactor on the Moon, by Becky Ferreira
Join us live in San Francisco on September 9th. Get your tickets here.
You can follow Zoë Schiffer on Bluesky at @zoeschiffer and Jake Lahut on Bluesky at @jakelahut.writes.news. Write to us at uncannyvalley@wired.com.
How to Listen
You can always listen to this week's podcast through the audio player on this page, but if you want to subscribe for free to get every episode, here's how:
If you're on an iPhone or iPad, open the app called Podcasts, or just tap this link. You can also download an app like Overcast or Pocket Casts and search for “uncanny valley.” We’re on Spotify too.
Transcript
Note: This is an automated transcript, which may contain errors.
Zoë Schiffer: Hey, this is Zoë. Before we start, I want to share some exciting news with you. We're doing a live show in San Francisco on September 9th, in partnership with KQED. Uncanny Valley cohosts, Lauren Good and Michael Calore will sit down with our editor in chief, Katie Drummond, and a special guest, for a conversation that you really won't want to miss. You can use the link in the show notes to grab your ticket and invite a friend. We can't wait to see you there. Welcome to WIRED's Uncanny Valley. I'm Zoë Schiffer, WIRED's director of business and industry. Today on the show, we're bringing you five stories that you absolutely need to know this week, including the less-than-warm reception that OpenAI's GPT-5 model got from users. I'm joined today by WIRED's senior politics writer, Jake Lahut.
Jake Lahut: Great to be back.
Zoë Schiffer: So our first story this week is about how the Trump administration has been posting memes to make fun of deportations. Have you seen these at all?
Jake Lahut: Yes, unfortunately I have. Yeah. Real fun, funny stuff.
Zoë Schiffer: Yeah, real dark. So WIRED contributor Tess Owen reported on this pattern of different official government accounts on social media using whatever is viral at the moment and tailoring it to promote and make fun of deportations. And this is especially popular in the accounts of the Department of Homeland Security and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, and the White House. So for example, there's this catchy jingle that belongs to Jet2, which is a low-budget British Airline that's been making the rounds lately on social media.
Archival audio: Nothing beats a Jet2 holiday, and right now—
Zoë Schiffer: Last month, DHS and the White House made a joint Instagram post incorporating the tune on top of footage of ICE detainees in handcuffs boarding a deportation plane, and the caption reads, “When ICE books you on one-way Jet2 holiday to deportation, nothing beats it.”
Jake Lahut: Oh my God.
Zoë Schiffer: I honestly have such a hard time thinking about who would find that funny, even if you really are anti-immigration, I don't know another way to say it, it just seems so mean.
Jake Lahut: Yeah, if you could have seen our faces when that was playing. Yeah, darling, hold my hand, I don't want to ever see anything like that ever again. Something I've picked up on ever since covering the Trump 2024 campaign, which is, there's obviously still a lot of really weird, cringy, messed up stuff going on here, but it's also an attempt, at least from their point of view in the weird bubble they're in to kind of mainstream this stuff.
Zoë Schiffer: Right. And this is actually the point, according to Tessa's reporting, she spoke to experts who said that the goal of this is really to normalize what's happening. The point isn't just to be crude or cruel, it's strategic. This sparked a bunch of backlash. It's not just you and me, but in response to WIRED's reporting, the White House gave a statement that basically just dismissed these concerns and said that it, “won't apologize for posting banger memes.” Moving on to the world of crypto. Our colleague Joel Kalili reported on a cryptocurrency business called World Liberty Financial, which I'm sure you're familiar with too, Jake.
Jake Lahut: Oh, yeah.
Zoë Schiffer: Which has come up with a clever workaround, I guess you could say, for the fact that crypto can't technically be traded on the stock exchange. So World Liberty is now allowing investors to speculate on the price of its coin by way of a little-known company that is legally listed on the NASDAQ, called Alt-Five Sigma Corporation. Are you familiar?
Jake Lahut: I am not as familiar with that word mash.
Zoë Schiffer: So this is where it gets kind of sticky because technically Alt-Five is marketed as a crypto payments company, but in practice, the deal will turn the stock into a sort of proxy for their crypto coin, basically allowing investors to bet on the asset without the hassle and risk that comes with holding a crypto coin themselves. It sounds very crypto. It's a scheme that has raised eyebrows, to say the least. One of Joel's Wall Street sources told us that what this move effectively does is build a holding company with the sole objective of creating a treasury for their crypto coin, about $1.5 billion worth, which could inflate the market capitalization of the coin.
Jake Lahut: And this is also controversial because this starts opening up a different can of worms where potential investors and politically motivated actors who are all in this orbit can have even more influence over the administration. We've already seen the way you can do that with the meme coin, now with World Liberty Financial they're obviously affiliated with Trump's adult sons, and the Trump family controls 22.5 percent of the WLFI coins and about a 40 percent equity stake in World Liberty Financial. So this is definitely the big game in town when it comes to buttering the Trump family's biscuit.
Zoë Schiffer: Right. I love how you said that. Yeah, basically, if you want to potentially try and curry favor with Trump, you buy into one of these schemes, and maybe you'll get invited to a fancy crypto dinner, which has happened before. Maybe you get something else. But even just the optics here are pretty suspect.
Jake Lahut: Yeah. And in a little side item we had in my Interloop Newsletter this week, we had some new data on the somewhat stunning lack of enforcement from the Trump administration across the tech sector, but crypto in particular had pretty much everyone who had been facing any kind of legal action from the Biden administration, having their enforcement actions either dropped completely or paused. And in one instance, we're looking at the maybe first ever pardoning of a company from one of these things. So you don't need to just pony up the money for these things and expect a legislative win, you can just get the heat pulled off of you on the regulatory front.
Zoë Schiffer: Right. So our third story, I'm really waiting for one that's not incredibly depressing, but right now we're going all the way to Arkansas where our colleague, David Gilbert, reported that a group of Americans are building a “whites-only community,” which they call Return to the Land. The group believes that white people and Western culture are facing extinction because of an influx of immigrants and minorities. And according to the group's founder, access to the community is open only to people of white European ancestry who share common views on things like segregation, abortion, and gender identity. Return to the Land's president shared their intellectual inspiration with David, the reporter, saying that they were partly inspired by venture capitalist and the son of immigrant parents, Balaji Srevenesin, and his book, The Network State, which promotes the idea of a digital-first community of people with shared values, with the aim of gaining a degree of sovereignty and autonomy.
Jake Lahut: And look, not just America, long history of a bunch of wacky well-intentioned or just downright weird utopias, but this one, a little different, because you're having the sovereignty to be racist. But in all seriousness, Zoë, how is any of this legal?
Zoë Schiffer: Yeah, I mean, that is the real question. So the whole premise goes back to the Fair Housing Act of 1968, which prevents housing discrimination based on race or religion, but Return to the Land claims that the structure of the community is more akin to a private member's association. And so far local authorities seem to agree. Arkansas’ attorney general, Tim Griffin, told WIRED that his office has found nothing illegal about the community. Surprise, surprise.
Jake Lahut: Yeah, it's like Erlich Bachman's incubator from Silicon Valley, but for white supremacy and racism.
Zoë Schiffer: Exactly. Exactly. OK, one more before we take a break. This one is about how the US is racing to build a nuclear reactor on the moon. WIRED contributor Becky Ferreira recently reported that NASA is fast-tracking a plan to build a nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030 under a new directive from the agency's interim administrator, Sean Duffy.
Jake Lahut: Sean Duffy, only in America, can you go from the Fox and Friends weekend couch to being secretary of transportation, to also doing this. He's a busy, busy man, multitasking—
Zoë Schiffer: He's a busy, busy man.
Jake Lahut: To the moon.
Zoë Schiffer: So his stated motivation is that the US has to stay ahead in what he deems to be the “moon race” with China and Russia. Both countries have expressed their desire to place nuclear reactors on the moon, and it's an appealing idea because nuclear energy is a powerful continuous source of energy. We're hearing about it more and more with the AI race. And so the directive laid out by Duffy is to quickly design, launch, and deploy an operational 100 kilowatt reactor to the lunar south pole within five years that would be built with commercial partners, and experts say this would be difficult, but not completely impossible. If it actually gets accomplished, it would potentially change the space industry. They could start designing space systems around what we want to do and not what smaller, often limited power allows them to do.
Jake Lahut: With the added bonus of effectively using a nuclear flag to prevent other countries from landing in this area, so, all right. Sounds promising, question mark?
Zoë Schiffer: It is, and there's always a “but,” there's also a mountain of safety and regulatory concerns that this would bring obviously, because we're literally dealing with nuclear energy in outer space. So how do you contain the uranium for one, how do you make sure to stay in your sovereign zone so you don't accidentally start a space war? All these questions are coming up and the accelerated process could make it even trickier.
Jake Lahut: Yeah. I extremely do not want to be here for a space war, so catch me pulling a Yoda in the Degaba system. I'll hide out until the all-clear has been given.
Zoë Schiffer: I'll be there with you. OK. Coming up, we'll dive into why OpenAI's latest model release ended up being kind of a flop despite all of the hype. Stay with us.
[break]
Zoë Schiffer: Welcome back to Uncanny Valley. I'm Zoë Schiffer, and I'm joined today by Jake Lahut. We're discussing the user response to OpenAI's release of GPT-5. OpenAI's GPT-5 model was meant to be like a world-changing upgrade to the wildly popular ChatGPT. Sam Altman had tweeted out the Death Star, they said it was going to have kind of virtuosic skill and PhD-level intelligence, and I think a lot of people felt like it was going to bring us basically up to artificial general intelligence. Were you aware of the hype leading up to everything?
Jake Lahut: I was definitely taken aback by the term “PhD-level intelligence” in the hype for all of this stuff. And what I started to wonder about was like, what is that going to look like compared to the more sycophantic glaze-you-up version of GPT-4.0?
Zoë Schiffer: So yeah, it was too much hype. They'd actually tried … I talked to sources about this, internally they were testing various models that they wanted to call GPT-5, and none were meeting the mark. And so I think there was a fair amount of pressure internally. If you talk to people who work closely with Sam, they'll say he really likes to have a big splash every three to four months, once a quarter at least. And so I think the combination of the fact that they hadn't released a major model in a while, I mean the open source models notwithstanding, they had been hyping GPT-5 for so long. There was this push to be like, “We have to release a model, a big model, and we kind of have to call it GPT-5.” Then the day it launched, there was supposed to be this feature that could automatically route your query based on how complicated it was. Like if you were asking something very simple, it would route you to a cheaper model basically. And if you were asking something more complicated, you might get a reasoning model. That broke according to Sam Altman, the CEO. And so the model just seemed dumber all day than it otherwise would. So I don't know. There was a lot going on.
Jake Lahut: And at least from my more layman outside politics world perspective on this, it does seem like a … From the economics to be a rather smart, more efficient way to go about it. But the part that really stood out to me though was more of the “personality” of GPT-5 and the revolts that it started on Reddit and among ChatGPT super users, of which I am admittedly not one.
Zoë Schiffer: Right, yeah. So this was really fascinating. I think one thing that happened, and again I'm pulling this from conversations with a bunch of sources inside the company, is that they really wanted to optimize for coding ability this time, because that's really been Claude's edge, Anthropic's AI model, and obviously it's a huge revenue driver. It's kind of the first area where we've seen a big widespread commercial adoption in a way that could do the thing that AI companies have been saying all along will be done, which is it'll disrupt and augment jobs in a pretty serious way. Engineers really are using these tools and companies are really pushing the tools on their own workforce. But like you said, the reason that regular people like models isn't often because of their coding ability. It's because they genuinely like talking to them. It's a lot more about the personality, about the warmth, even about the sycophancy, although they've fixed a large part of that in the latest release. And so people completely flipped out. We were looking at Reddit and people were saying, “This is erasure, what have they done? Take me back to 4.0.”
Jake Lahut: “You took away my friend.”
Zoë Schiffer: Yeah, I mean it really, really impacted people. I think on the most extreme ends, you see people who have what looks like perhaps like a mental health crisis, they're so attached to the model, but then you just have complete power users who are like, “This is part of my minute by minute life. What have you done? You didn't warn me.”
Jake Lahut: And this is where the introspective aspect of these tools, the kind of desire for self-understanding, the people who are not advisably from any medical perspective, but they are trying to use these bots for something akin to therapy. And what it made me think of when I saw this rolling out was, is this maybe the beginning of something bigger where there's kind of a departure between the “regular consumer” experience and demand for AI versus the business application? We may not all have the same definition of intelligence when it comes to these models, and that some of us really just want a buddy, a companion, a way to know ourselves better. And then other people are like, “No, I just need a little team of bots here to manage, get my stuff done, I'm going to babysit and I'm going to tell them what to do and live my life.” And yeah, I don't know where that goes. It does seem like it's revealing something maybe genuinely new about the human condition in a way that I would not have expected.
Zoë Schiffer: Yeah, I mean, I think it's been a learning for OpenAI. They've been kind of baffled. I've seen these conversations internally where they're like, “I guess people don't care as much about intelligence as we thought.” The narrative around intelligence is critically important for fundraising, if nothing else, they really need to raise gobs of money and being like, “We're about to achieve artificial and general intelligence, AI will be able to do all of these things,” is really important for that. But for everyday users, it really makes me think of this story that is kind of famous inside OpenAI about the night before the ChatGPT release in November of ’22, Ilya, he was testing out what was going to be ChatGPT and asked it 10 pretty hard questions. And he felt like five of them, he got pretty good responses, and five were unacceptably bad. And they had this moment where they were like, “Do we release this? I don't know if it's good enough.” And then they decided to move forward. And what we saw was the general public was like, “This is amazing.” Because they'd solved a product issue. It wasn't necessarily about the model, which had been out for a long time. It was like the interface to interact with the model was really the unlock. And I think OpenAI, that really is more and more the company's edge, even though it really sees itself as a research lab. It's a product lab in a lot of ways, and it'll be interesting to see how that changes the company moving forward.
Jake Lahut: Absolutely.
Zoë Schiffer: That's our show for today. We'll link to all the stories we spoke about in the show notes. If you're in San Francisco, don't forget to get your tickets for the September 9th event with KQED. Make sure to check out last Thursday's episode of Uncanny Valley, which is about what Palantir actually does and why it's so controversial. Adriana Tapia produced this episode, Amar Lal at Macrosound mixed this episode. Pran Bandi is our New York studio engineer. Kate Osborn is our executive producer. Condé Nast head of global audio is Chris Bannon, and Katie Drummond is WIRED's global editorial director.