内容来源：https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/23/john-carreyrou-and-other-authors-bring-new-lawsuit-against-six-major-ai-companies/

内容总结：

近日，包括知名血液检测公司Theranos“吹哨人”、《坏血》作者约翰·卡雷鲁在内的一批作家，联合对Anthropic、谷歌、OpenAI、Meta、xAI及Perplexity等多家科技公司提起诉讼，指控其使用盗版书籍训练人工智能模型。

此次诉讼并非首例。此前已有作家团体就类似侵权行为对Anthropic提起集体诉讼。当时法院裁定，虽然AI公司使用盗版书籍训练模型的行为本身不违法，但获取盗版内容的过程仍属非法。

尽管相关作家可从Anthropic高达15亿美元的和解基金中获得约3000美元赔偿，但许多创作者认为这远未体现其作品价值。诉讼文件指出，现有和解方案“看似更维护AI公司利益而非创作者权益”，并强调“大型语言模型公司不应以极低成本轻易抵消成千上万的高价值侵权索赔，逃避其大规模故意侵权应承担的实际代价”。

原告方认为，AI公司利用盗版内容训练模型创造了巨额商业收益，当前赔偿方案未能真正追究其侵权使用行为的责任。这场诉讼再度引发业界对人工智能训练数据合法性及创作者权益保护的热议。

中文翻译：

包括Theranos举报人、《坏血》作者约翰·卡雷鲁在内的一批作家，正对Anthropic、谷歌、OpenAI、Meta、xAI及Perplexity等公司提起诉讼，指控这些企业使用盗版书籍训练其人工智能模型。

此类诉讼似曾相识，因为此前已有另一批作家就相同的版权侵权行为对Anthropic提起集体诉讼。在先前案件中，法官裁定Anthropic及同类AI公司使用盗版书籍训练模型的行为合法，但获取盗版书籍本身仍属违法。

尽管符合资格的作家可从Anthropic高达15亿美元的和解金中获得约3000美元赔偿，部分作者对此解决方案并不满意——这未能追究AI公司使用盗版书籍训练模型（该行为已为其创造数十亿美元收入）的实际责任。

新诉讼文件指出，原告认为Anthropic提出的和解方案"似乎更倾向于维护AI公司利益而非创作者权益"。诉状中强调："大型语言模型公司不应以如此低廉的代价轻易化解成千上万的高价值索赔，逃避其大规模故意侵权本应承担的真实成本。"

英文来源：

A group of writers, including Theranos whistleblower and “Bad Blood” author John Carreyrou, is filing a lawsuit against Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Meta, xAI, and Perplexity, accusing the companies of training their models on pirated copies of their books.
If this sounds familiar, it’s because another set of authors already filed a class action suit against Anthropic for these same acts of copyright infringement. In that case, the judge ruled that it was legal for Anthropic and similar AI companies to train on pirated copies of books, but that it was not legal to pirate the books in the first place.
While eligible writers can receive about $3,000 from the $1.5 billion Anthropic settlement, some authors were dissatisfied with that resolution — it doesn’t hold AI companies accountable for the actual act of using stolen books to train their models, which generate billions of dollars in revenue.
According to the new lawsuit, the plaintiffs say that the proposed Anthropic settlement “seems to serve [the AI companies], not creators.”
“LLM companies should not be able to so easily extinguish thousands upon thousands of high-value claims at bargain-basement rates, eliding what should be the true cost of their massive willful infringement,” the lawsuit says.