«

特朗普再次出手，意图废除州级人工智能监管法规。

qimuai 发布于 阅读：5 一手编译

特朗普再次出手，意图废除州级人工智能监管法规。

内容来源：https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/898055/trump-new-ai-policy-framework

内容总结：

特朗普政府于周五公布其人工智能监管新立法蓝图，提出七点核心方针。该蓝图明确传递出联邦政府应避免过度监管AI的信号，仅围绕儿童安全领域制定明确规则，同时要求各州不得干扰“实现全球AI主导地位的国家战略”。

这份文件在儿童安全条款上回应了两党共同关切，但仍将加速AI发展置于优先位置。其建议国会加强对未成年人使用AI服务的保护，采取措施防止AI基础设施推高电价，并鼓励开展青少年AI技能培训，但未提供具体方案。在版权问题上，文件主张观望态度，暂不明确未经许可使用受版权保护材料训练AI是否合法，并延续了共和党长期主张，试图限制各州自行制定AI相关法律。

值得注意的是，所有条款须经国会立法程序方能生效。蓝图支持推行类似《下架法案》的立法，禁止未经同意的AI生成亲密图像，并要求平台快速移除相关内容；同时提倡建立商业合理、保护隐私的年龄验证机制。文件也建议建立联邦框架，防止未经授权使用AI生成的个人声音、肖像等数字复制品，但强调应为 parody、新闻报道等受宪法第一修正案保护的情形设置例外。

在监管架构上，文件反对设立新的联邦AI监管机构，主张由各领域现有监管机构负责；并强烈要求国会阻止各州对AI开发设置“不当负担”，避免出现“五十套相互矛盾的标准”，称AI监管涉及外交和国家安全，理应由联邦主导。不过，在儿童隐私保护方面，各州仍可执行禁止儿童性虐待材料等普遍适用的法律。

整体而言，蓝图的核心目标仍是加速AI创新与应用，要求国会移除创新壁垒，推动联邦数据集以“AI就绪格式”开放给企业和学术界用于模型训练。文件还提及应防范AI助长的大规模诈骗，保障老年人等弱势群体，并强调在防御“觉醒AI”与保障言论自由之间寻求平衡，禁止政府基于党派或意识形态强制AI提供商审查内容。

此外，针对AI数据中心建设导致的电价上涨担忧，蓝图建议国会确保居民电费不受影响，但同时要求简化数据中心的联邦许可程序，鼓励企业自建发电设施，以继续全力推进AI基础设施建设。

中文翻译：

特朗普政府周五公布了其人工智能监管的新立法蓝图，这份七点计划传递出明确信号：除儿童安全规则外，联邦政府应避免制定过多AI监管法规，并应禁止各州干扰"实现全球AI主导地位的国家战略"。

特朗普再度试图瓦解各州AI监管体系

这份新政策蓝图在儿童安全问题上顺应了两党压力，但仍将AI发展速度置于优先地位。

该计划建议国会通过更多保障措施保护使用AI服务的未成年人，并采取行动防止AI基础设施导致电费飙升。它鼓励开展"青少年发展与技能培训"以提升对AI工具的熟悉度，但未提供更多细节。同时建议对未经许可使用受版权保护材料训练AI模型是否合法采取观望态度，并延续共和党长期推动的限制各州自行制定AI法律的立场。

但整份文件及其所有条款，唯有在国会将其采纳为立法并通过后才会生效。

特朗普政府的蓝图鼓励通过类似《下架法案》的法律——该法案于2025年5月签署生效，禁止未经同意的AI生成"私密视觉描绘"，要求特定平台快速移除此类内容。文件还支持年龄验证，建议国会"为可能被未成年人访问的AI平台和服务建立商业合理、保护隐私的年龄确认要求（如家长证明）"。从隐私角度看，年龄验证机制存在争议，可能引发大量监控隐患。文件同时提出其他儿童保护措施，如限制AI模型使用未成年人数据进行训练，以及基于此类数据的定向广告投放（文件并非完全禁止，而是限制这些行为）。但文件同时声明，国会"应避免制定关于许可内容的模糊标准或开放式责任条款，以免引发过度诉讼"。

在深度伪造技术日益成熟、AI生成视频逼真度空前、政客虚假视频可能瞬间引爆全球阴谋论的时代，新政策蓝图主张"考虑建立联邦框架，保护个人免遭未经授权传播或商业利用其声音、肖像等可识别特征的AI数字复制品"（这可能意味着最终将建立联邦肖像权法）。但文件同时指出，立法者应为 parody、新闻报道、讽刺作品及其他受宪法第一修正案保护的使用场景提供"明确例外"。

该蓝图还反对国会介入AI版权议题。"尽管政府认为使用受版权保护材料训练AI模型不构成侵权，但也承认存在相反观点，因此支持由法院裁决此事"，文件写道，"国会不应采取任何可能影响司法系统判定训练行为是否构成合理使用的行动。"

在另一章节中，蓝图对日益由AI驱动的大规模诈骗表示关切，建议国会"加强现有执法力度，打击针对老年人等弱势群体的AI仿冒诈骗"，但未提供具体细节。

特朗普政府延续了近一年来（迄今未成功）推动的亲联邦、反各州的AI监管思路。蓝图称国会应"优先于施加不当负担的各州AI法律"，避免企业面临"五十种不协调的标准"，并强调"不应允许各州监管AI开发，因为AI本质上是跨州现象，涉及关键外交政策和国家安全"。文件还为AI公司提供了其他法律保护，例如各州不应"因第三方滥用模型的不法行为处罚AI开发者"。但在儿童隐私章节，文件确实给予各州有限灵活空间，声明国会不应阻止各州"执行普遍适用的儿童保护法律，例如禁止儿童性虐待材料，即使该材料由AI生成"。这一让步源于两党众多人士对推翻地方儿童安全法的担忧，包括近40名美国各州及领地的总检察长。

与先前提案一致，该蓝图的总体目标是加速AI发展。"美国必须通过消除创新壁垒、加速AI应用跨领域部署来引领全球AI发展"，文件指出，并建议国会设法以"适用于AI训练的格式"向AI企业和学术界开放联邦数据集，但未具体说明哪些类型数据将公开。该计划还明确回答了AI监管领域的长期争议——应由单一联邦机构负责AI监管，还是由各行业自行监管——指出国会"不应设立任何新的联邦规则制定机构来监管AI"；相反，将通过"具备专业知识的现有监管机构支持特定领域AI应用的开发与部署"。

特朗普总统去年7月签署行政命令，通过禁止政府机构使用涉及"系统性种族主义"等议题的模型来防止"觉醒AI"。他近日还命令所有机构将"激进左翼AI公司"Anthropic列入黑名单，因其限制军方使用其模型，Anthropic称此举侵犯其宪法第一修正案权利。与此同时，蓝图强调政府"必须捍卫言论自由和第一修正案保护，同时防止AI系统被用于压制或审查合法的政治表达与异议"，进一步建议国会应明确禁止政府"基于党派或意识形态议程胁迫AI提供商禁止、强制或修改内容"，若政府机构审查AI平台表达或操控其提供信息，国会应为美国人提供"寻求救济"的途径。

上月我们见证了首个解决数据中心周边社区高额电费问题的两党合作提案，新AI政策框架似乎回应了双方关切，建议国会确保"住宅用户不会因新建AI数据中心的建设运营而承受更高电费"。但文件同时指出，国会应简化数据中心建设运营的联邦许可程序，使AI企业更易"开发或获取现场及表后发电设施"——这意味着数据中心建设仍应全速推进，但社区居民不应在月度账单中实际承担代价。

热门资讯

英文来源：

The Trump administration on Friday unveiled its new legislative blueprint for AI regulation, and the seven-point plan includes a clear message: The federal government should avoid many AI regulations beyond a set of child safety rules, and it should bar states from messing with the “national strategy to achieve global AI dominance.”
Trump takes another shot at dismantling state AI regulation
The new policy blueprint bowed to bipartisan pressure on child safety but still prioritized AI acceleration.
The new policy blueprint bowed to bipartisan pressure on child safety but still prioritized AI acceleration.
The plan advises Congress to protect minors using AI services with more safeguards and take action to attempt to prevent electricity costs from spiking due to AI infrastructure. It encourages “youth development and skills training” to boost familiarity with AI tools, without much further detail. But it suggests taking a wait-and-see approach to whether training AI models on copyrighted material without permission is legal, and it maintains a long-running Republican push to limit whether states can enact their own AI laws.
The entire document and all its provisions, however, will only take effect if Congress adopts them into legislation and passes them into law.
The Trump administration blueprint encourages passing laws similar to the Take It Down Act — which was signed into law in May 2025 and bars nonconsensual AI-generated “intimate visual depictions,” requiring certain platforms to rapidly remove them. The document also is pro-age verification, suggesting that Congress “establish commercially reasonable, privacy protective, age assurance requirements (such as parental attestation) for AI platforms and services likely to be accessed by minors.” Age-gating is controversial from a privacy standpoint and has a lot of potential surveillance implications. It proposes other child protection measures like limiting the ability for AI models to train on minors’ data and limits to targeted advertising based on their data. (The document does not seek to prohibit those practices for children’s data, just limit them.) At the same time, it states that Congress “should avoid setting ambiguous standards about permissible content, or open-ended liability, that could give rise to excessive litigation.”
In the age of deepfakes, when AI-generated videos are looking more real than ever and a fake video of a politician can instantly propagate global conspiracy theories, the new policy blueprint seeks to “consider establishing a federal framework protecting individuals from the unauthorized distribution or commercial use of AI-generated digital replicas of their voice, likeness, or other identifiable attributes.” (That could mean finally creating a federal likeness law.) But it also says lawmakers should provide “clear exceptions” for parody, news reporting, satire, and other First Amendment-protected use cases.
The blueprint also discourages Congress from taking up AI copyright issues. “Although the Administration believes that training of AI models on copyrighted material does not violate copyright laws, it acknowledges arguments to the contrary exist and therefore supports allowing the Courts to resolve this issue,” it says. “Congress should not take any actions that would impact the judiciary’s resolution of whether training on copyrighted material constitutes fair use.”
In another section, the blueprint raises concerns about large-scale scams and fraud that are increasingly powered by AI, stating that Congress should “augment existing law enforcement efforts to combat AI-enabled impersonation scams and fraud that target vulnerable populations such as seniors,” although no extra details are provided.
The Trump administration continued leaning into the pro-federal, anti-state approach to AI regulation that it’s been promoting (so far unsuccessfully) for nearly a year. The blueprint says Congress should “preempt state AI laws that impose undue burdens” and avoid “fifty discordant” standards for companies, adding that states “should not be permitted to regulate AI development, because it is an inherently interstate phenomenon with key foreign policy and national security implications.” Other legal protections for AI companies were baked in, too, such as the idea that states shouldn’t be allowed to “penalize AI developers for a third party’s unlawful conduct involving their models.” But in the child-privacy section, the document does allow states some limited wiggle room, stating that Congress shouldn’t preempt states from “enforcing their own generally applicable laws protecting children, such as prohibitions on child sexual abuse material, even where such material is generated by AI.” The allowance comes after numerous figures from both parties expressed concern about overturning local child safety laws, including nearly 40 attorneys general for US states and territories.
The overall goal, as in earlier Trump administration proposals, is speeding AI development. “The United States must lead the world in AI by removing barriers to innovation [and] accelerating deployment of AI applications across sectors,” the document states, adding that Congress should find ways to make federal datasets available to AI companies and academics in “AI-ready formats for use in training AI models and systems.” It didn’t specify which types of federal datasets it sought to make publicly available for AI training. The plan also definitively answers a long-asked question in AI regulation — whether there should be one federal body responsible for AI regulation or whether AI regulation should be left to each sector — and says that Congress “should not create any new federal rulemaking body to regulate AI”; instead, it says, it will “support development and deployment of sector-specific AI applications through existing regulatory bodies with subject matter expertise.”
President Trump signed an executive order last July seeking to prevent “woke AI” by banning government agencies from using models that “incorporated” topics like systemic racism. He recently ordered all agencies to blacklist the “Radical Left AI company” Anthropic for setting limits on military use of its models, something Anthropic alleges violates its First Amendment rights. At the same time, the blueprint states that the government “must defend free speech and First Amendment protections, while preventing AI systems from being used to silence or censor lawful political expression or dissent.” It goes further to say that Congress should explicitly prevent the government from “coercing” AI providers “to ban, compel, or alter content based on partisan or ideological agendas” — and that in the event that government agencies censor expression on AI platforms or dictate the information they provide, then Congress should provide a way for Americans to “seek redress.”
Last month, we saw the first bipartisan effort to address higher utility bills in communities with data centers nearby, and the new AI policy framework seems to address those concerns on both sides of the aisle, saying that Congress should find ways to make sure that “residential ratepayers do not experience increased electricity costs as a result of new AI data center construction and operation.” But, it says, Congress should streamline federal permits for data center construction and operation, making it easier for AI companies to “develop or procure on-site and behind-the-meter power generation” — meaning that data center construction should still be full-speed-ahead, but community members shouldn’t have to literally pay the price on their monthly bills.
Most Popular

ThevergeAI大爆炸

文章目录

    📚 推荐阅读


    扫描二维码，在手机上阅读
    版权所有：启幕AI
    文章标题：特朗普再次出手，意图废除州级人工智能监管法规。
    文章链接：https://qimuai.cn/?post=3629
    本站文章均为原创，未经授权请勿用于任何商业用途