内容来源：https://www.wired.com/story/uncanny-valley-podcast-palantir-most-mysterious-company-silicon-valley/

内容总结：

科技公司Palantir深陷争议：数据监控与军事合作引国际抗议

由科技亿万富翁彼得·蒂尔联合创立的美国大数据公司Palantir，因与移民海关执法局（ICE）、美国国防部及以色列军方合作而屡遭质疑，其业务模式和数据应用引发多国民众抗议。在近期播客节目《诡异谷》中，WIRED资深记者卡罗琳·哈斯金斯深入剖析了这家神秘企业的运作逻辑。

争议核心：数据监控与军事化应用
Palantir的两大核心产品“Foundry”和“Gotham”分别服务于企业客户与政府机构。后者被用于整合执法部门的案件数据，甚至协助ICE开发价值3000万美元的“移民监控平台”，以追踪和筛选驱逐对象。此外，Palantir还为美国国税局构建统一数据接口，进一步扩大其政府合作版图。

创始人愿景：“技术国家”的军事化底色
CEO亚历克斯·卡普与蒂尔长期倡导“技术国家”理念，主张科技应服务于西方军事霸权。公司内部文化充满军事术语，员工自称“霍比特人”，口号“拯救夏尔”暗喻维护美国利益。卡普在财报会议上直言Palantir的目标包括“威慑乃至消灭敌人”，其新书《技术共和国》更呼吁硅谷回归“为国家效力”的传统。

舆论风波：隐秘文化与公众信任危机
尽管Palantir否认直接买卖数据，但其保密政策和合作对象的敏感性加剧公众疑虑。记者哈斯金斯曾在报道该公司活动时遭驱逐，凸显其对外界监督的排斥。随着Palantir股价近年飙升2500%，批评者担忧其技术正加速军事化与监控常态化。

目前，Palantir的扩张步伐与争议并存，其技术伦理与地缘政治影响将持续受到审视。

中文翻译：

由科技亿万富翁彼得·蒂尔联合创立的帕兰提尔公司曾与美国移民海关执法局、国防部及以色列军方合作，在多国引发抗议浪潮。《连线》杂志撰稿人卡罗琳·哈斯金斯做客《诡异谷》节目，为我们解密这家神秘企业。

本期提及文章：

• 《帕兰提尔究竟做什么业务？》
• 《帕兰提尔正协助国税局开展大规模数据工程》
• 《移民海关执法局斥资3000万美元委托帕兰提尔打造"移民监控系统"》
• 劳伦最新报道：《AMD掌门人苏姿丰正对英伟达虎视眈眈》

9月9日旧金山现场活动门票预售中
听众可通过Bluesky关注主持人：迈克尔·卡洛尔(@snackfight)、劳伦·古德(@laurengoode)、卡罗琳·哈斯金斯(@carolinehaskins)。欢迎致信uncannyvalley@wired.com。

收听方式
除网页播放器外，推荐订阅：
苹果设备用户可通过Podcasts应用或专属链接订阅，亦可在Overcast/Pocket Casts等应用搜索"Uncanny Valley"。节目同步登陆Spotify。

（以下为节目实录，自动转录可能存在误差）

迈克尔·卡洛尔：大家好，我是迈克。开场先分享个好消息：9月9日我们将与KQED电台合作在旧金山举办现场活动，总编辑凯蒂·德拉蒙德将携神秘嘉宾与我们展开精彩对谈。门票链接详见节目备注。

劳伦，听说你刚完成重磅采访？
劳伦·古德：没错！我们《连线》"深度对话"栏目专访了AMD董事长兼CEO苏姿丰。在奥斯汀芯片实验室的交流令人难忘——这位让AMD起死回生的技术领袖，与英伟达掌门人黄仁勋竟有表亲关系。

迈克尔：等等...他们真是亲戚？
劳伦：远房表亲。不过她可不喜欢总被拿来比较。（笑）作为工程师出身的CEO，她现场追问技术细节的专业程度令人叹服。

迈克尔：各位务必阅读这篇报道。对了，采访是在美国政府宣布对芯片企业征收15%附加费之前吧？
劳伦：正是。半导体行业新闻简直日新月异，我们不得不反复确认是否需要更新内容。

（节目正片）
欢迎收听《连线》旗下科技深度访谈《诡异谷》。今天我们要剖析这家政府合同不断增长的争议性软件公司——帕兰提尔。随着其与特朗普政府关系密切，今年该公司政府业务收入同比激增3.7亿美元。但与美国移民执法部门、国防部及以色列政府的合作，也使其深陷舆论漩涡。

核心问题在于：这家公司究竟在做什么？我们只知道它处理海量数据，但具体运作方式成谜。就连前员工都难以准确定义其服务内容。今天我们将深度解析：

• 业务实质与常见误解
• 未公开的政府合作项目
• 创始人"技术治国"理念如何塑造企业基因

（嘉宾访谈节选）
卡罗琳·哈斯金斯指出公众常见误区："很多人误以为它是数据中间商或监控系统供应商，实则其核心产品是数据整合平台Foundry（企业版）和Gotham（政府版）。后者能帮助执法部门绘制社交关系图谱——比如通过分析Facebook数据识别帮派关联。"

劳伦提及本台此前报道："移民局用其系统筛选驱逐对象，国税局借其构建全域数据接口。这种涉及公民隐私的大规模数据整合，正是争议焦点所在。"

卡罗琳分享亲身经历："在某智库展会上，我只是在帕兰提尔展台做笔记就被强行驱逐，对方甚至威胁报警——而他们仅是展会赞助商。"

（企业文化解密）
节目深入剖析了公司独特的军事化文化：

• 员工互称"霍比特人"，口号是"守护夏尔"
• 采用北约无线电代号：工程师称"Delta"，产品经理叫"Echo"
• 邮件用军事术语"FYSA"（供知悉）替代"FYI"

CEO亚历克斯·卡普在财报会议上的发言令人玩味："我们为西方世界服务...必要时会震慑乃至消灭敌人。"这种亦真亦幻的战争修辞，恰折射出硅谷"军事科技复合体"的崛起。

（技术治国论）
卡普新著《技术共和国》呼吁科技界回归"国家服务"传统，与彼得·蒂尔推崇的"网络城邦"理念形成有趣呼应。随着帕兰提尔股价自2020年上市暴涨2500%，这种"科技强权"哲学正在资本市场获得背书。

（尾声彩蛋）
三位主持人分别推荐了：

1. 英国真人秀《4-6岁儿童的秘密生活》（卡罗琳）
2. HBO剧集《年轻的教宗》（劳伦）
3. 《纽约》杂志付费专栏《夜校》（迈克尔）

欢迎订阅《诡异谷》并评分。听众来信请寄uncannyvalley@wired.com。本期节目由阿德里安娜·塔皮亚与马克·利达制作，混音师阿马尔·拉尔，事实核查萨姆·斯潘格勒。执行制作人凯特·奥斯本，《连线》全球总编凯蒂·德拉蒙德，康泰纳仕音频总监克里斯·班农联合呈现。

英文来源：

Cofounded by tech billionaire Peter Thiel, Palantir has worked with ICE, the US Department of Defense, and the Israeli military, and it has sparked numerous protests in multiple countries. WIRED staff writer Caroline Haskins joins Uncanny Valley to decode the company for us.
Articles mentioned in this episode:

• What Does Palantir Actually Do?
• Palantir Is Helping DOGE With a Massive IRS Data Project
• ICE Is Paying Palantir $30 Million to Build ‘ImmigrationOS’ Surveillance Platform
• Lauren’s latest article: Lisa Su Runs AMD—and Is Out for Nvidia’s Blood
  Join us live in San Francisco on September 9th: Get your tickets here
  You can follow Michael Calore on Bluesky at @snackfight, Lauren Goode on Bluesky at @laurengoode, and Caroline Haskins on Bluesky at @carolinehaskins. Write to us at uncannyvalley@wired.com.
  How to Listen
  You can always listen to this week's podcast through the audio player on this page, but if you want to subscribe for free to get every episode, here's how:
  If you're on an iPhone or iPad, open the app called Podcasts, or just tap this link. You can also download an app like Overcast or Pocket Casts and search for “Uncanny Valley.” We’re on Spotify too.
  Transcript
  Note: This is an automated transcript, which may contain errors.
  Michael Calore: Hey, this is Mike. Before we start, I want to share some exciting news with you. We're doing a live show in San Francisco on September 9th in partnership with the local station KQED. Lauren and I will sit down with our editor in chief, Katie Drummond, and we'll have a special guest joining us for a conversation that you will not want to miss. You can use the link in the show notes to grab your ticket and invite a friend. We cannot wait to see you there.
  Hey, Lauren. How are you doing?
  Lauren Goode: I'm pretty good, Mike. I'm a little tired because we just published a big story I've been working on for a long time.
  Michael Calore: Oh. Do tell us.
  Lauren Goode: Well, now that you've asked, we have a series here at WIRED called The Big Interview. Every so often we get to interview the most interesting people in tech and beyond. And we do this very long Q&A, a lot of research goes into it, original photography. It's a really cool series. And in the most recent one I interviewed Lisa Su, the chair and CEO of AMD.
  Michael Calore: Lisa Su from AMD?
  Lauren Goode: That's correct.
  Michael Calore: Nice.
  Lauren Goode: Yeah.
  Michael Calore: Did you fly to Texas?
  Lauren Goode: Austin, Texas. I was there to spend some time with Lisa Su and tour the labs, their chip-testing labs down there. And it was a fascinating conversation. She's a super smart lady, and she has managed a pretty remarkable turnaround of AMD over the past dozen years.
  Michael Calore: Nice.
  Lauren Goode: So, we talked a lot about that, we talked about export controls. We talked about competing with Nvidia, run by her cousin. Did you know that Jensen Huang and Lisa Su are distant cousins?
  Michael Calore: No.
  Lauren Goode: You really didn't know that?
  Michael Calore: No.
  Lauren Goode: Yes, distant. First cousins, once removed. But she prefers not to be always asked about him, constantly pitted against him. The cousin thing irritates her.
  Michael Calore: Right, right.
  Lauren Goode: Of course, we talked about Nvidia. Anyway, I spent some time in the labs with her, because she's an engineer by trade. She was asking some highly technical questions of her engineers. It was really fascinating to witness.
  Michael Calore: Nice.
  Lauren Goode: We took a car ride together, we talked about personal stuff. It was one of my favorite interviews I've ever done at WIRED. So, that's out today.
  Michael Calore: Everybody should read it.
  Lauren Goode: Thank you.
  Michael Calore: And I'm assuming that you conducted this interview before the deal with the US government.
  Lauren Goode: The 15 percent fee that Nvidia and AMD are now going to be paying to the US government?
  Michael Calore: That would be the one.
  Lauren Goode: Yes. I did that interview beforehand. News has constantly been breaking in the semiconductor space since then. So we keep going back to Sandra, one of our editors and saying, “Should we update this? Do we need to update this? You can't keep up.”
  Michael Calore: Yeah, that's the news business.
  Lauren Goode: Yep.
  Michael Calore: Sometimes you just got to say, “Ship it.”
  Lauren Goode: That's right. Ship it. I'm sure all the techies listening to this will appreciate that. Let's ship this show.
  Michael Calore: Let's ship this show.
  This is WIRED's Uncanny Valley, a show about the people, power, and influence of Silicon Valley. Today, we are talking about Palantir, a controversial software company with an ever-growing list of government contracts. The company has received a lot of attention this year because of its close ties with the Trump administration. Palantir's US government revenue has grown by more than $370 million compared to this time last year. But alongside its rising revenue and its rising profile, the company has also received widespread backlash because of its roster of clients, which includes ICE, the US Department of Defense, and the Israeli government.
  One question that has become hard to answer is what exactly the company does. We know Palantir works with vast amounts of data, but it's not clear what they do with it. WIRED's Caroline Haskins went looking for answers, and she found that even former Palantir employees had trouble closely defining the company's services.
  So we're going to dive into what Palantir does, what it does not do, and how its cofounders’ dream of a techno state continues to shape the company's goals, and potentially, our future. I'm Michael Calore, director of consumer tech and culture at WIRED.
  Lauren Goode: And I'm Lauren Goode. I'm a senior correspondent.
  Michael Calore: To break down what Palantir is all about, we had to invite Caroline Haskins onto the show. Caroline is a staff writer on WIRED's Business Desk who has been closely covering the company for years. Welcome to Uncanny Valley. Caroline.
  Caroline Haskins: Hi. Thanks for having me on.
  Lauren Goode: Caroline, we're so excited to have you on. And can we give Caroline just a little bit of cred? Which we're going to get to later in the show, but everyone should know to start that Caroline I think is the only one among us who's been kicked out of a Palantir event before. So we're going to have to ask you about that, just in FYI.
  Michael Calore: Yeah, we'll get to that later.
  Caroline Haskins: Yeah, happy to share it.
  Michael Calore: So, I want to start with defining what Palantir isn't. Caroline, what are some of the common misconceptions that you've encountered around the company services?
  Caroline Haskins: Yeah. It's funny, because it seems like Palantir is kind of having a growing reputation among the public. People know the company Palantir, but they still, just among the general public, have a hard time saying what it actually is. It's often used as kind of a shorthand for just talking about surveillance generally. There are people who think that it's more akin to something like a data broker that's buying and selling data from place to place. Or a data miner that's actively taking information offline and packaging it and selling it in some way.
  I mean, it actually isn't any of these things, but the misconceptions have been pretty widespread. Palantir has actually had to put out a couple of blogs. I think the titles are literally “Palantir Is Not a Data Company” and “Palantir Is Still Not a Data Company.” I think it's a seven-part series on its website. But there's a reason that these misconceptions exist; it's because it's hard to define what Palantir actually is.
  Lauren Goode: OK. So, Palantir is not buying or selling data, or I guess harboring data in giant databases, but they still work with a lot of data. They sell their services to help other companies gather up a lot of data and structure it. Is that correct?
  Caroline Haskins: Correct. Palantir does not actually sell any data, but it is providing just the infrastructure and tools that its customers can use to actually work with data. Over the 2010s, I'm sure everybody remembers there was all of this marketing around big data, leveraging your data. And all of these companies were trying to just say how they were really smart.
  Lauren Goode: Yeah, it was all very nebulous.
  Caroline Haskins: Yeah. Yeah, exactly. Palantir was founded in the early 2000s, in the couple of years after 9/11, but it's business really didn't start taking off until that decade, and I think that in part that's because it was able to meet the moment, because it sells essentially like a one-size tool that can be customized for different customers, that can replace, say, a dozen or more other tools that a company might buy to try and get better insights, manage its factory lines better, manage orders better, make smarter decisions.
  Michael Calore: Yeah. In your story, you got all kinds of descriptions from your sources who used to work at Palantir about what the company does. One of them called it a really extravagant plumbing with data. Another called it a collection of different applications that customers can use to operationalize data, which is a fantastic word to have in a quote.
  Lauren Goode: I mean, that literally sounds like the AI from LinkedIn was let loose.
  Michael Calore: My favorite is the source who called it a supercharged filing cabinet. But there are specific things that Palantir sells, right? And I think if we can go through some of those, we might be able to get a better idea of what they do.
  Caroline Haskins: So Palantir has a couple of different products, but its two main flagship products are these things called Foundry on one hand, and then Gotham on the other. Foundry is more oriented toward private enterprise corporations, that type of customer. So think like Walmart or something. And then the other one is Gotham, that's more oriented toward law enforcement, government agencies, places that are actually dealing with case information, things about actual people, trying to figure out relationships between people, that kind of work.
  On the other hand, Foundry is more being used to just make regular everyday business practices more efficient. So, whereas a customer might use Foundry to, say, instead of having to completely redo their IT systems because their company is like 60 years old and they have a combination of really old code and then really new software, and they can't figure out how to just make it all flow together, they don't actually have to go in and fix it. Foundry just sits on top of everything and allows them to get the insights that they need to without actually fixing any of the stuff that's going on underneath. It's like a technical bandaid in that sense.
  And then Gotham, similarly, it is sitting on top of systems that law enforcement and a government agency might already have. The difference is that it's working with case information, it might work through information from a social media company. So, if a police department asks for everything associated with someone's Facebook profile, it would ingest all of that. And the whole idea is that you can map the relationships between people.
  So, police departments have used this to try and map out alleged gang affiliations. They can also extract things like whether someone has a tattoo, which is information that police might have if they have a booking record on somebody. Gotham is not actually providing any of this information, it's just helping police work through the information that they already have.
  Lauren Goode: So, it's easy to see where some of the concerns come in around data collection then, because even if Palantir isn't selling new data, or aggregate data to another enterprise or something like that, it's still aggregating and transforming all of this data, and putting it into this powerful tool. And then, there's the specific government contracts. Caroline, you reported earlier this year for WIRED that ICE is paying Palantir $30 million to help the agency select who to deport and to track who was self-deporting. Around the same time, our colleague McKenna Kelly reported that Palantir was working with the IRS to build what sources called a Mega API, which would essentially unify all data across the agency.
  And then of course, there are military contracts. A lot of the contracts that Palantir works with, there is an expectation of confidentiality going in, which is I think where some of this vibe of mystery and secrecy comes from. And I think it's because a lot of these products are then deployed at a large scale, people start to grow concerned when they just think about there's this entity out there that is just sort of helping to gather all of this data into one space. And it seems like Palantir hasn't always wanted to engage with some of these criticisms, or answer questions about this. Caroline, you had firsthand experience with this.
  Caroline Haskins: Yeah. There was a conference that was being held in DC by the Special Competitive Studies Project, the SCSP, it's the think tank that was founded by Eric Schmidt who, obviously, used to be at Google. They have a ton of booths from all these different companies. And the whole idea is that you walk around and then you sit at one booth and you watch someone do a demo of some kind of software, and then you move on to the next one, and you talk to employees, that kind of thing. And I was watching a couple demos at the Palantir booth, and I wasn't even asking any questions, I was just taking some notes. And then I think at one point I walked to a different booth and then I turned around and went back, and they said that I was not allowed back in the booth, and that if I did come back they would call the police. And I was like, “Wait, why?” And they didn't give me a reason. They also didn't give me one when I asked for comments.
  Lauren Goode: OK. Did you go back?
  Caroline Haskins: No. I think I walked out of the booth and I immediately called one of my editors, and yeah, she was just like, “Let's just not do that for now. It's OK.”
  Lauren Goode: Wow. They really took it to 11.
  Caroline Haskins: Yeah, I don't know. I mean, I talked to event security and I was like, “Was there a rule I wasn't aware of? I mean, I don't see how I could have been breaking any rules.” “Or did they flag something about certain participants?” And event security, I mean, they had no idea what I was talking about. Yeah, I'm not really sure.
  Lauren Goode: I'm sorry that happened to you. I mean, it sounds like Palantir was not putting on the event, it was another entity and Palantir was a part of it?
  Caroline Haskins: Right, Palantir is one of the main sponsors of the event. So, if you're paying enough money, then you get one of the giant booths at the front of the conference hall. So they had this really fancy setup.
  Michael Calore: Wow.
  Lauren Goode: Well, Caroline, if they didn't have data on you before, they do now.
  Caroline Haskins: Yeah, I think I’m on their radar to some degree, I guess.
  Michael Calore: One of the great things about your story is that it helps us really understand the types of services that Palantir actually offers, and what those services look like when they interact with the real world. But you had to talk with several former staffers and really dig in to put all these pieces together. So for a company that is so intertwined with all kinds of organizations and public government services, Palantir has to be secretive, and they're notoriously secretive, as we just talked about. What are some of the other reasons why they just don't want people poking around in what they're doing?
  Caroline Haskins: It's interesting. I think probably one of the most insightful conversations I had, a former content strategist at Palantir was talking about how at a traditional tech company that might be marketing products to consumers, or maybe like a social media company, they have to make things legible for just the average member of the public, because those are the people that are buying their products. But Palantir, their products are extremely expensive. They're targeting essentially gigantic corporations and bureaucracies that really need help sorting things out and getting the insights that they need.
  They don't really need to be talking to consumers in that way. The reason why it's putting out those blogs is that I think it's become a PR problem at this point, that people are making assumptions about the company that are trying to make a criticism, but aren't really putting their finger on what the company is actually doing. So in that sense, it's become a PR problem for them. But to a degree, they don't have to market to the average person. And it does kind of benefit them to cultivate this aura of mystique and power. Like, what we are doing is so important that the public can't know, maybe, exactly the extent of our products.
  And this is something that appeals to, I mean, if you are a high up person at the company and you know that you need to get some sort of product, let's say you're not super technical, this is exactly the kind of rhetoric, visuals, et cetera, that might appeal to someone.
  Lauren Goode: It seems like secrecy is also embedded in the origins of the company. One of its early investors was in QTEL, which is the CIA's venture capital arm. And two of Palantir's cofounders are pretty well-known. Peter Thiel, we've talked about a few times on this show, and Alex Karp, seem like they have intentionally wanted to position the company as a government and military partner, which, like we said earlier, inevitably comes with some secrecy.
  Michael Calore: We need to take a break now, but when we come back, we're going to dive further into those founders that you just talked about, Lauren, and we're going to break down how their vision of a techno state has shaped the company, and what it can mean for our collective future.
  Welcome back to Uncanny Valley. Before the break, WIRED's Caroline Haskins was telling us all about Palantir services, and how the company actually works with data and the software that it sells to organizations. But it's through looking at two of Palantir's cofounders, particularly Peter Thiel and Alex Karp, that the company's identity starts to come into sharper focus.
  Peter Thiel almost needs no introduction. We've talked about him on the show before. And besides being one of the cofounders of Palantir, he used to be part of the so-called PayPal Mafia, and has gathered widespread attention for his support of the current administration and other GOP candidates. Alex Karp is the current CEO of Palantir, and he co-founded the company alongside Thiel and a few other people in 2003. So from the start, what vision did they set up for the company?
  Caroline Haskins: I feel like maybe a useful way into that is to talk about some of the internal jargon that Palantir uses. I mean, even just externally, the name Palantir actually comes from Lord of the Rings. It's this idea of an all-seeing stone that can look across vast expanses of land in the present, or go into the past. So the whole idea of that is to provide a product to that is seemingly extremely powerful and can go wherever you would need it to go. But then I guess internally, I think employees have really adopted this attitude that they are solving the world's most difficult problems and making the world a better place.
  So, they've kept with the Lord of the Rings language, even just talking amongst each other. Employees call themselves internally, since really the early days of the company, they've called each other hobbits. To the best of my knowledge. I'm not sure how popular this phrase is these days, but a motto that was circulated internally was Save the Shire. So it does get back to this idea of, we're trying to save the world, we're trying to make the world a better place, we're trying to catch terrorists. We're trying to do these really difficult things that make the world a better place-
  Lauren Goode: And the Shire in this case is what? It's these Western ideals and all-powerful government. Is it our country? What's the Shire?
  Caroline Haskins: I mean, in one sense, you could understand the Shire as the United States and all of its allies. The term that Alex Karp uses most frequently is the West, or western values. A big thing that the company has tried to stand on is, "We're only going to be doing business with companies that are in the United States or allied with the United States in some sense, militarily." It does get to this idea of security and being aligned with the US military interests.
  A military mindset has also been something that's pervaded the internal culture at Palantir since the very beginning. Instead of calling people just like software engineers, they call them forward deployed engineers. So, by forward deployed, they're essentially referencing the term for forward deployed troops, which is when in the military use station troops that are somewhere near an adversarial region with the idea being that's going to deter them from making a move against you. They've also used NATO military radio terms as code names for different job titles, like Delta was the one that was associated with fraud deployed engineers. And then they also have a version of a product manager, which instead they call Echo. Those are the words for D and E on the NATO military radio code name list.
  Another example, something that someone else brought up to me was when they're writing emails to each other, instead of saying FYI, they go FYSA, which means, for your situational awareness. And that's another thing that originated in the military.
  Lauren Goode: So intense in these San Francisco or Palo Alto offices. They're like, "FYSA, the bevy machine is out of the mint cucumber flavor today."
  Caroline Haskins: No, exactly, exactly. There's so many examples of this. What was another one? Yeah, "Bottom line up front," that was another one that someone mentioned, it just means you write a two-sentence summary at the start of an email. So instead of saying TLDR, you go BLUF and then give a two-sentence summary.
  Lauren Goode: Bottom line up front.
  Michael Calore: I'm going to start doing all of these.
  Lauren Goode: I could see your eyes light up when Caroline was going through. This is really interesting.
  Michael Calore: "For your situational awareness, I will be at the dentist today."
  Lauren Goode: Caroline, when you spoke to these former employees about working there, how did they feel about this culture?
  Caroline Haskins: They didn't really seem critical of the use of these terms from the most part, but there were people that I spoke with that just felt uncomfortable with military work that was happening in other parts of the company. There was one woman I spoke with who specifically brought this up, and how she essentially had to actively choose to suppress the knowledge of the fact that there were probably products that were being built at other parts of the company that she would be extremely morally opposed to.
  But on the other hand, I think there were other people I spoke to who just had a functional appreciation for these little habits, like the bottom line up front thing or the FYSA. This didn't make it into the article, but one person said, "I've gone on to other workplaces and I've actively introduced some of these things into my other workplaces." So, some people just have a functional appreciation for, I don't know, I guess that kind of communication style. It's funny.
  Lauren Goode: That's interesting. And some of this rhetoric has actually made its way into executive communications too. Our producer pulled up a clip from Alex Karp speaking during Palantir's earnings call this past February. And there were a couple lines that really jumped out at me, so we're going to take a quick listen.
  Alex Karp: We have dedicated our company to the service of the West and the United States of America, and we're super proud of the role we play, especially in places we can't talk about. And we love our success in the US, and globally also, we are doing, in the United Kingdom and many other places, Palantir is here to disrupt and make the institutions we partner with the very best in the world. And when it's necessary to scare enemies, and on occasion kill them.
  Lauren Goode: Oh, just killed it. So, is he referring to killing business competitors? Are the enemies business competitors? Or is he talking about actual adversaries to the United States?
  Caroline Haskins: That's the funny thing with that clip, because he used the word disrupt, which obviously disruption is a common thing that people just mentioned in a Silicon Valley business context.
  Lauren Goode: Right. Very Silicon Valley coded.
  Caroline Haskins: Right. But then when he talks about killing. I mean, everybody knows that some of Palantir's first clients were members of the US intelligence community, in that it does work across branches of the US military. And these are products that are designed to be lethal. So these are things that are literally talking about killing people, but there's plausible deniability in terms of talking about killing your business competitors or something, or killing the competition. It's just the interesting use of boards.
  Michael Calore: So, it's obvious that Palantir is eager to embrace this close tie with government work and military work, but this is also part of a larger belief that not only should this be Palantir's mission, but also Silicon Valley's larger mission. To that point, Karp wrote a book recently called The Technological Republic. And in this book he laid out the philosophy of technology being created in service of a state, so a techno state. He kind of reminisces about the times when technology and science and governments all came together to defeat a common enemy instead of, "Building things because they can," which is serious shade at, I don't know, a company that makes food delivery apps. He calls for a renewed unity around this mindset of the techno state. What are your thoughts on Karp's philosophy here?
  Lauren Goode: I haven't read Alex Karp's book yet. I would like to. I did read the excerpt in The Atlantic. I think what's kind of interesting about both Peter Thiel and Alex Karp, even though sometimes their politics aren't entirely aligned, they both coalesce around this shared vision of the techno state and powering the West to what they call its obvious innate superiority. And they're not alone. There is a group of really influential people in Silicon Valley, this cohort who I sometimes call the War Bois, B-O-I, bois.
  Michael Calore: I love the name.
  Lauren Goode: Yeah. And I think that they are shifting the culture a little bit, and having people focus less on the attention economy software and the social media that got a lot of the attention in 2010s, and saying to people like, "You need to build more serious tech here." And some of that happens to be tech for the military. We've also written about Palmer Luckey at WIRED who is a cofounder of Anduril. Anduril is a defense tech company that makes autonomous weapons. He's a part of this cohort as well. Earlier this summer, a bunch of tech CTOs and other executives joined this detachment that's supposed to help make the US armed forces leaner, smarter, more lethal, basically provide tech advice to the military. So for example, Meta CTO, Andrew Bosworth, is now Lieutenant Colonel Bosworth, or Bos.
  Michael Calore: Oh, boy.
  Caroline Haskins: Yeah, it's interesting. I mean, some people have pointed out that in some ways it's kind of a return to roots for Silicon Valley, because I mean, in the 20th century it was kind of a place where defense infrastructure was built out. And then it sort of pivoted away from that. I mean, I guess one thing that's maybe worth pointing out about someone like Alex Karp is that for the entirety of the time that Palantir has been around, he's been extremely ideologically consistent. I mean, even through the 2010s when, I mean, no companies were openly embracing working with the military, or doing work in defense tech, which is partially why Anduril, Palantir, they just sort of stood in contrast with a lot of these other companies. But now I think with Trump in office and there just being all of this rhetoric that's centered around patriotism, that's centered around these ideas of strength, especially in the context of war, it's suddenly become, I guess, business-friendly to be embracing these kinds of ideas.
  Michael Calore: It seems like the time is now for this vision of the techno state that Karp and Thiel have been laying out. So, are we seeing it play out in real time?
  Lauren Goode: Well, judging by Palantir's current valuation, we might've entered the techno state. It has been pushing into record territory just over the past week since Palantir went public in 2020, their stock has gone up nearly 2500 percent.
  Michael Calore: Excuse me?
  Lauren Goode: Yeah. That's just in terms of the numbers though. I'm curious to hear from a cultural perspective, Caroline, what do you think?
  Caroline Haskins: Yeah. One thing when I think about Peter Thiel and the companies that he's been involved with and the ventures that he's funded, there often isn't a completely consistent through line. I mean, one thing I've been following on the side is the amount of so-called network state projects that he's funded, or essentially trying to make these almost city state like areas that people who work in tech that feel frustrated with working on software that doesn't have visible effects on the real world can just go to and escape the United States, or escape the political friction of a place like Silicon Valley.
  But then in contrast, I mean, someone like Alex Karp, he's really never doubted the concept of the network state, and having that as a grounding force for your political philosophy and your business philosophy. And I guess the one thing uniting them in the end is this desire for strength for monopoly, I guess, in the business context, and for hegemony in the context of politics and wars between countries.
  Michael Calore: OK. We're going to take one more break, and then we'll come right back.
  Lauren, Caroline, thank you for a great conversation about the techno state. Before we go, we want to shift gears a little bit and we're going to share our personal recommendations with the listeners. So, should we have Caroline go first?
  Lauren Goode: Absolutely. As our guest of honor.
  Michael Calore: OK. What do you got?
  Caroline Haskins: I stumbled upon this show recently called The Secret Life of 4, 5 and 6 Year Olds. It's this UK reality TV show where they essentially put mics and cameras on a playground around, again, these four, five, and six-year-olds who, I mean, the four-year-olds, they've never even interacted with other peers their age essentially unsupervised before. And you're seeing literal stages of brain development happening in real time. Like a kid realizing that, "Oh, if I'm fighting over this toy, that means that this other person wants it too, and we might have to work out a compromise."
  I landed there because I went on a TikTok rabbit hole that started with a New York City public school teacher showing how they set up their classroom, and then a kindergarten teacher setting up their classroom. And then I was like, "Wait, I forget what happens in kindergarten." So then I was looking up, "What do you do in kindergarten?" And then this show came up. And it was so interesting. And obviously, really funny and cute. Even if you're not a huge kid's person, I don't know, I just thought it was really interesting.
  Michael Calore: Talk about a techno state. Let's put cameras on all the kids.
  Lauren Goode: Seriously.
  Michael Calore: When broadcast their brain development.
  Lauren Goode: Has Palantir sold their software to nursery schools yet?
  Michael Calore: Sorry, where is this show streaming?
  Caroline Haskins: It was on Amazon Prime, and then I also think someone uploaded the whole thing onto YouTube. So, either way you can find it.
  Lauren Goode: OK.
  Michael Calore: Fantastic.
  Lauren Goode: I like how Caroline's like, "Even if you're not a kid's person, you might still enjoy this."
  Michael Calore: She's speaking to her audience, which is-
  Lauren Goode: No, I like this.
  Caroline Haskins: I want to capture all ends of the spectrum.
  Lauren Goode: That's right. That's right. It also sounds like a nice little palate cleanser after reporting on some of the stuff you've been reporting on, Caroline.
  Caroline Haskins: Honestly, it was. Yeah, yeah. The kids are really funny.
  Michael Calore: Lauren, what's your recommendation?
  Lauren Goode: My recommendation is TV series on HBO Max, The Young Pope, which I started watching because I want to watch The New Pope with John Malkovich, but I figured I should watch The Young Pope with Jude Law first.
  Michael Calore: Yeah, yeah.
  Lauren Goode: So it's not new. I think it came out in 2019.
  Michael Calore: Yeah.
  Lauren Goode: Jude Law is absolutely diabolical as a Pope. I've recommended a lot of Pope stuff on this show before. My longtime listeners will know.
  Michael Calore: It's those Catholic roots coming out.
  Lauren Goode: Yeah, I guess so. You can take a girl out of church, but can't take church out of the girl. Is that even a phrase?
  Michael Calore: Yes.
  Lauren Goode: Did I just make that up?
  Michael Calore: No, but you translated into English from the original Italian, I think is what it is.
  Lauren Goode: Yeah. Mike, what's your recommendation?
  Michael Calore: I am going to recommend a newsletter. It is from one of our competitors, New York Magazine. It's a subscriber-
  Lauren Goode: Never heard of them.
  Michael Calore: They're great. They do good work. It's a subscriber only newsletter from New York. It's called Night School. And it is people who work at New York Magazine and some of the people who are contracted to work with them explaining how they do their jobs, and how you can apply this knowledge into your hobbies or your own jobs.
  So for example, they have a newsletter about how to take a photo. And it comes out every week, and it's written by the photo editors and the photographers at New York Magazine. They have one about how to write, which is written by the writers and the editors. Again, that one comes out every week. And then there was one that Jerry Saltz, the art critic, just did, how to look at art. And he basically tells you how to go to a gallery, how to experience a museum, what do you do when you go to an artist talk, what are good questions to ask, what sorts of things you look forward to determine whether something is actually good.
  The photo one really blew my mind though, like how to take a photo. I take a lot of photos, I think I take a pretty good photo, but I read a few of these newsletters and immediately was able to up my game. And I take better portraits now, for sure.
  Lauren Goode: That's very cool.
  Michael Calore: Yeah. So, if you are a subscriber to New York Magazine, you can go into their newsletter page, and you can click subscribe to these, and you get these courses, and they come once a week, and they're very digestible and fun. And you will learn something.
  Lauren Goode: I actually am a subscriber, and I have not subscribed to that.
  Michael Calore: Well, here you go.
  Lauren Goode: I'll do that right now.
  Michael Calore: This is a benefit that you are not yet earning.
  Lauren Goode: Amazing.
  Michael Calore: I hope you love it.
  Lauren Goode: Thanks for that recommendation, Mike.
  Michael Calore: And Caroline, thank you for being here, and thank you for your recommendation about the Watching Kids Grow Up Show.
  Caroline Haskins: No, thank you. And I really need to learn how to take a better picture. I feel like people stop me on the street and they're like, "Can you take a picture of me and my friend?" I have to apologize to them at the end. I'm like, "I did the best I could. I'm sorry."
  Michael Calore: Thank you for listening to Uncanny Valley. If you'd liked what you heard today, please make sure to follow our show and rate it on your podcast app of choice. If you'd like to get in touch with us with any questions, comments, or shows, suggestions, you can write to us at uncannyvalley@wired.com.
  Today's show was produced by Adriana Tapia and Mark Lida. Amar Lal at Macro Sound Mixed this episode. Mark Lida is our SF studio engineer; Pran Bandi is our New York Studio engineer; Sam Spangler fact-checked this episode. Kate Osborne is our executive producer; Katie Drummond is WIRED's Global Editorial Director; and Chris Bannon is Conde Nast's Head of Global Audio.