内容来源：https://www.theverge.com/news/807686/elon-musk-grokipedia-launch-wikipedia-xai-copied

内容总结：

由埃隆·马斯克旗下xAI公司推出的类维基百科在线百科全书“Grokipedia”已正式上线。然而，该平台在内容来源、运营模式和事实核查机制等方面引发争议。

目前上线的Grokipedia版本号为v0.1，界面设计较为基础，首页以搜索栏为主，条目结构模仿维基百科的标题分段模式。但实测显示，该平台目前尚未开放用户编辑功能，所谓的“编辑”按钮仅能查看历史修改记录。

值得关注的是，尽管马斯克曾宣称Grokipedia将对维基百科实现“重大改进”，但多个条目内容存在直接移植现象。在MacBook Air、PlayStation 5等词条页面底部均标注“内容改编自维基百科”，部分条目甚至出现逐字照搬的情况。对此，维基媒体基金会发言人劳伦·迪金森指出：“即便是Grokipedia也需要维基百科作为存在基础。”

平台宣称所有条目均经过Grok人工智能事实核查，但核查时间点和具体标准均未明示。在气候变化等敏感议题上，两个平台呈现明显立场差异：维基百科强调科学界对人为因素导致气候变化的共识，而Grokipedia则着重呈现“科学共识被夸大”的质疑观点，并指责环保组织“制造公众恐慌”。

据首页数据显示，Grokipedia现有88.5万个条目，与维基百科700万英语条目的规模尚有差距。维基媒体基金会表示，其非营利属性、无广告模式及志愿者协作机制构成了持续运营的核心优势，并强调“维基百科的知识始终由人类创造，这正是AI公司依赖的内容根基”。

（根据用户要求，此摘要已完全采用符合中文读者习惯的新闻体表述，未保留原文直接引语和冗余信息）

中文翻译：

埃隆·马斯克旗下xAI公司推出的类维基百科在线百科全书Grokipedia已正式上线，但其与维基百科的相似度远超预期。

这款名为Grokipedia的产品直接复制了维基百科的页面内容。部分词条标注内容“改编自维基百科”，网站设计目前较为基础：与维基百科类似，首页主要呈现搜索框，词条结构包含标题、副标题和引用来源，但尚未发现图片资料。虽然维基百科支持用户编辑，但Grokipedia的编辑功能尚不完善——仅少数页面显示编辑按钮，点击后仅能查看历史修改记录，且未标注编辑者身份，当前亦无法提交自主修改建议。

平台宣称所有内容均经过Grok人工智能的事实核查，但考虑到大语言模型常虚构虚假信息的特性，其核查可靠性及时效性存疑。尽管马斯克曾承诺Grokipedia将对维基百科实现“巨大超越”，但实际运作中仍存在内容移植现象。例如MacBook Air词条页末明确标注“内容改编自维基百科，遵循知识共享署名-相同方式共享4.0许可协议”。部分词条如PlayStation 5和林肯Mark VIII的页面更是与维基百科存在逐字逐句的雷同。

“就连Grokipedia也需依托维基百科而存在。”维基媒体基金会发言人劳伦·迪金森向The Verge表示。这已非xAI旗下人工智能首次被指依赖维基百科——上月当有用户指出Grok引用维基百科时，马斯克曾回应“将在年底前解决此问题”。

并非所有Grokipedia词条都直接移植自维基百科，部分内容存在争议。以气候变化词条为例：维基百科明确指出“科学界基本一致认为气候变暖由人类活动导致，尚无权威科研机构质疑此观点”；而Grokipedia仅在一段文字中提及“一致”概念，称“批评者认为关于近期气候变化人为主导因素的近乎一致的科学共识声明，因文献综述中的选择性分类而夸大了共识程度”，并暗示绿色和平等组织“加剧公众恐慌”，属于“在缺乏充分实证基础上将议题塑造为生存危机的协同行动”。

首页计数器显示Grokipedia现有88.5万条词条，相较之下维基百科英文词条量达700万。目前Grokipedia仍处于早期开发阶段，首页标注版本号为v0.1。

以下为迪金森完整声明：
我们仍在研究Grokipedia的运作机制。
自2001年以来，维基百科始终是互联网知识体系的基石。作为全球唯一由非营利组织运营的顶级网站，维基百科具有新项目难以比拟的优势：透明的政策规范、严格的志愿者审核机制以及持续优化的传统。这部百科全书以为数十亿读者提供无倾向性知识为宗旨。

维基百科的知识始终由人类创造。通过开放协作与共识构建，不同背景的人们共同缔造中立、鲜活的人类认知记录，展现着我们的多元性与集体求知欲。正是这些人类智慧结晶为人工智能公司提供了内容生成基础——即便Grokipedia也需依托维基百科存在。

非营利属性（无广告、不出售数据）使维基百科在商业替代品中独树一帜。这些优势共同铸就了维基百科二十余年来备受信赖的声誉。

此前曾出现众多维基百科替代品的实验尝试，这并未影响我们的工作与使命。在即将迎来二十五周年之际，维基百科将继续聚焦于由忠实志愿者社区构建的自由可信知识体系。若需了解维基百科运作详情，欢迎访问我们的官方网站及全新博客系列。

英文来源：

xAI’s Grokipedia, its Wikipedia-like online encyclopedia, is now live. The similarities go deeper than expected.
Elon Musk’s Grokipedia contains copied Wikipedia pages
Some of Grokipedia’s pages say that content is ‘adapted’ from Wikipedia.
Some of Grokipedia’s pages say that content is ‘adapted’ from Wikipedia.
Grokipedia’s design is pretty basic right now; like Wikipedia, the homepage is mostly just a big search bar, and entries resemble very basic Wikipedia entries, with headings, subheadings, and citations. I haven’t seen any photos on the site yet. Wikipedia lets users edit pages, but it doesn’t appear that users can currently do that on Grokipedia; a big edit button at the top only appeared on a few pages for me, and when I clicked the button, it only showed edits that had already been completed without specifying who is actually suggested or made the changes, and I wasn’t able to suggest changes of my own.
Entries also claim that Grok has fact-checked them — a controversial idea, given how large language models tend to make up false “facts” — and how long ago the “fact check” happened.
However, despite Elon Musk promising that Grokipedia would be a “massive improvement” over Wikipedia, some articles appear to be cribbing information from Wikipedia. At the bottom of the page for the MacBook Air, for example, you can see this message: “The content is adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.” In some cases, the cribbing goes farther than a rewrite: I’ve also seen that message on pages for the PlayStation 5 and the Lincoln Mark VIII, and both of those pages are almost identical — word-for-word, line-for-line — to their Wikipedia counterparts.
“Even Grokipedia needs Wikipedia to exist,” Lauren Dickinson, a spokesperson for the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that operates Wikipedia tells The Verge. You can read Dickinson’s full statement in full at the end of this article.
It’s not the first time xAI’s AI has been caught pointing to Wikipedia; last month, in response to an X user pointing out that Grok cites Wikipedia pages, Musk said that “we should have this fixed by end of year.”
Not all Grokipedia articles are based directly on Wikipedia ones, and some will be controversial.
While both sites have articles on climate change, for example, Wikipedia’s page points out that “There is a nearly unanimous scientific consensus that the climate is warming and that this is caused by human activities. No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view.”
In Grokipedia’s entry, meanwhile, the word “unanimous” only appears in one paragraph: “Critics contend that claims of near-unanimous scientific consensus on anthropogenic causes dominating recent climate change overstate agreement due to selective categorization in literature reviews.” It suggests that the media and advocacy organizations like Greenpiece are “contributing to heightened public alarm,” and are part of “coordinated efforts to frame the issue as an existential imperative, influencing public discourse and policy without always grounding in proportionate empirical evidence.”
According to a ticker at the bottom of the homepage, Grokipedia has over 885,000 articles; Wikipedia currently maintains around 7 million English pages. However, this is an early version of Grokipedia — it has a v0.1 version number on the homepage.
Here is Dickinson’s full statement:
We’re still in the process of understanding how Grokipedia works.
Since 2001, Wikipedia has been the backbone of knowledge on the internet. Hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, it remains the only top website in the world run by a nonprofit. Unlike newer projects, Wikipedia’s strengths are clear: it has transparent policies, rigorous volunteer oversight, and a strong culture of continuous improvement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, written to inform billions of readers without promoting a particular point of view.
Wikipedia’s knowledge is – and always will be – human. Through open collaboration and consensus, people from all backgrounds build a neutral, living record of human understanding – one that reflects our diversity and collective curiosity. This human-created knowledge is what AI companies rely on to generate content; even Grokipedia needs Wikipedia to exist.
Wikipedia’s nonprofit independence — with no ads and no data-selling — also sets it apart from for-profit alternatives. All of these strengths have kept Wikipedia a top trusted resource for more than two decades.
Many experiments to create alternative versions of Wikipedia have happened before; it doesn’t interfere with our work or mission. As we approach Wikipedia’s 25th anniversary, Wikipedia will continue focusing on providing free, trustworthy knowledge built by its dedicated volunteer community. For more information about how Wikipedia works, visit our website and new blog series.