内容来源：https://www.geekwire.com/2025/the-hot-new-thing-at-aws-reinvent-a-database-pricing-update/

内容总结：

在拉斯维加斯举行的AWS re:Invent大会上，当亚马逊云科技首席执行官马特·加曼宣布推出“数据库节省计划”时，现场爆发出当天最热烈的欢呼。这一看似普通的服务更新承诺，用户只需承诺一年使用期，即可在Aurora、RDS和DynamoDB等核心数据库服务上节省高达35%的费用。

开发者的热烈反应揭示出云计算市场的现实矛盾：尽管科技巨头不断推出尖端人工智能工具，但许多企业和开发者仍面临基础服务成本管理的核心挑战。新推出的节省计划提供了以往未有的灵活性，允许用户在切换数据库引擎或迁移区域时仍享受折扣，直击用户长期痛点。

长期关注云成本优化的行业专家科里·奎恩评论称，该计划“比预期更有诚意”，因其覆盖服务范围超出预期。但他也指出三点局限：合约期限仅限一年、不包含旧代实例、且不适用于存储与备份费用。他还特别提到，该计划未涵盖EC2计算服务，意味着无法在计算与数据库支出间灵活调配资源。

值得注意的是，引发热烈反响的不止定价调整。例如支持无服务器函数长时间暂停等待的“Lambda持久函数”功能，同样获得现场开发者积极响应。加曼在发布会尾声采用“10分钟倒计时发布25项非AI产品”的形式，巧妙展现了AWS服务生态的广度，也呼应了并非所有参会者都只为AI而来的现实。

当倒计时归零之际，加曼压轴宣布数据库节省计划时的自信预告——“我相信大家都会喜欢这个压轴惊喜”，最终被现场欢呼声验证。这场发布会表明，对开发者而言，切实的成本优化有时比前沿技术演示更具吸引力。

中文翻译：

拉斯维加斯——亚马逊云科技首席执行官马特·加曼花了近两个小时，试图用全新大语言模型、先进AI芯片和自主智能体打动观众，但最终证明俘获开发者芳心的最快方式并非神经网络，而是降价。

在周二亚马逊云科技re:Invent大会的主题演讲中，最热烈的欢呼声献给了"数据库节省计划"。这项看似平凡却备受期待的更新，承诺为Aurora、RDS和DynamoDB等数据库服务提供高达35%的费用减免，前提是用户需承诺一年使用期。

现场反应揭示了云服务客户长期面临的矛盾：尽管科技巨头不断推出日益精密的AI工具，众多企业和开发者仍在应对核心服务成本管控这一基础挑战。

新版节省计划通过提供前所未有的灵活性来解决这一问题，允许开发者在切换数据库引擎或迁移区域时仍能保留折扣优惠。

"亚马逊云科技数据库节省计划：六年抱怨终得回报"，这是《上周在AWS》专栏作者科里·奎因略带讽刺的评论标题。这位鸭嘴兽公司首席云经济学家专精于降低AWS账单，其文风向来犀利诙谐。

奎恩称这项新计划"好得出乎意料"，因其覆盖服务范围比预期更广，但他也指出几个关键缺陷：仅限一年期合约（意味着无法锁定三年更大幅度的节省）、不包含旧代实例类型，且不适用于存储或备份费用。

他还提及该计划未涵盖EC2（弹性云计算）服务，认为无法在计算和数据库支出间灵活调配是错失了提升弹性的良机。

但引发热烈反响的基础服务升级不止于此。例如，现场观众同样为Lambda持久化函数高声喝彩——这项功能使得无服务器代码能够暂停并等待长时间运行的背景任务而不会失效。

加曼将这些发布融入本届re:Invent的新环节：用十分钟倒计时形式密集推出25项非AI产品，现场甚至设置了投篮计时器。这个设计既展现了AWS服务的广度，也暗示并非所有观众都只为AI资讯而来。

他在倒计时归零前的最后几秒公布了数据库节省计划。从加曼铺垫的方式来看，他显然预见到这将引爆全场——他将这项发布形容为"我相信各位都会喜爱的压轴彩蛋"。

至少从现场雷鸣般的欢呼判断，他确实说对了。

英文来源：

LAS VEGAS — After spending nearly two hours trying to impress the crowd with new LLMs, advanced AI chips, and autonomous agents, Amazon Web Services CEO Matt Garman showed that the quickest way to a developer’s heart isn’t a neural network. It’s a discount.
One of the loudest cheers at the AWS re:Invent keynote Tuesday was for Database Savings Plans, a mundane but much-needed update that promises to cut bills by up to 35% across database services like Aurora, RDS, and DynamoDB in exchange for a one-year commitment.
The reaction illustrated a familiar tension for cloud customers: Even as tech giants introduce increasingly sophisticated AI tools, many companies and developers are still wrestling with the basic challenge of managing costs for core services.
The new savings plans address the issue by offering flexibility that didn’t exist before, letting developers switch database engines or move regions without losing their discount.
“AWS Database Savings Plans: Six Years of Complaining Finally Pays Off,” is the headline from the charmingly sardonic and reliably snarky Corey Quinn of Last Week in AWS, who specializes in reducing AWS bills as the chief cloud economist at Duckbill.
Quinn called the new “better than it has any right to be” because it covers a wider range of services than expected, but he pointed out several key drawbacks: the plans are limited to one-year terms (meaning you can’t lock in bigger savings for three years), they exclude older instance generations, and they do not apply to storage or backup costs.
He also cited the lack of EC2 (Elastic Cloud Compute) coverage, calling the inability to move spending between computing and databases a missed opportunity for flexibility.
But the database pricing wasn’t the only basic upgrade to get a big reaction. For example, the crowd also cheered loudly for Lambda durable functions, a feature that lets serverless code pause and wait for long-running background tasks without failing.
Garman made these announcements as part of a new re:Invent gimmick: a 10-minute sprint through 25 non-AI product launches, complete with an on-stage shot clock. The bit was a nod to the breadth of AWS, and to the fact that not everyone in the audience came for AI news.
He announced the Database Savings Plans in the final seconds, as the clock ticked down to zero. And based on the way he set it up, Garman knew it was going to be a hit — describing it as “one last thing that I think all of you are going to love.”
Judging by the cheers, at least, he was right.