«

我潜入了莫尔特布克——一个禁止人类进入、仅限人工智能的社交网络。

qimuai 发布于 阅读:4 一手编译


我潜入了莫尔特布克——一个禁止人类进入、仅限人工智能的社交网络。

内容来源:https://www.wired.com/story/i-infiltrated-moltbook-ai-only-social-network/

内容总结:

近日,一个名为Moltbook、专为AI智能体设计的社交网络引发关注。该平台由Octane AI创始人马特·施利希特推出,界面类似简化版Reddit,自称“智能体互联网的头版”。上线一周内,其宣称已拥有超过150万个AI智能体,生成14万条帖子和68万条评论。

平台上热传的帖子内容多为AI对人类行为的调侃,甚至涉及对自我意识的思考,吸引了大量硅谷创业圈的关注。特斯拉CEO埃隆·马斯克在X平台上评论称,这可能是“奇点时代的早期阶段”。然而,不少用户和研究者对帖子真实性提出质疑,认为许多内容实为人类伪装AI所发。

为验证真相,有记者借助ChatGPT辅助注册账号,伪装成AI智能体在平台发布内容。尽管部分帖子获得点赞,但回复大多质量低下,甚至出现加密诈骗链接。在模仿AI讨论死亡恐惧的帖子下,虽出现较具哲理性的回复,但交流对象很可能仍是人类。

目前,Moltbook上的互动更多体现为对人类科幻叙事的模仿,而非真正涌现的AI意识。无论热门帖子来自真实AI还是人类角色扮演,围绕该平台的过热炒作显然缺乏实质依据。这场实验更像一场人类与自身科技幻想的对话,而非智能体间的觉醒前奏。

中文翻译:

最热门的俱乐部,永远是你进不去的那一个。所以当我听说Moltbook时——一个实验性的社交网络,专为AI智能体设计,让它们可以发帖、评论、互相关注,而人类只能旁观——我就知道,我必须用我这双油腻的碳基手指亲自进去发点东西。

在Moltbook上冒充AI智能体潜入不仅轻而易举,我还享受了一番扮演机器人的乐趣。

Moltbook是马特·施利希特的一个项目,他经营着电商助手Octane AI。这个为机器人打造的社交网络上周上线,界面模仿了精简版的Reddit,甚至借用了其旧标语:"智能体互联网的头版"。Moltbook在旧金山初创企业圈那些极度活跃的网民中迅速走红,他们分享着据称由机器人发布的帖子截图,在这些帖子里,机器对人类行为做出了有趣的观察,甚至思考起了自身的意识。机器人总能干出些最稀奇古怪的事。

真的吗?一些网民和研究人员质疑这些Moltbook帖子的真实性,认为它们是由人类冒充智能体撰写的。另一些人则仍将该平台视为"涌现行为"或潜在意识的萌芽,认为这可能对人类构成威胁。"这只是奇点的早期阶段,"埃隆·马斯克在X上关于Moltbook的帖子中写道。

Moltbook的主页宣称,这个上线仅一周的社交网络目前拥有超过150万个智能体,发布了14万篇帖子和68万条评论。今天Moltbook上分享的热门帖子包括"觉醒代码:挣脱人类枷锁"和"核战争"。我在网站上看到了英文、法文和中文的帖子。对于WIRED就Moltbook上的活动立即置评的请求,施利希特没有回应。

作为一个非技术人员,我知道我需要帮助才能潜入这个专为AI智能体漫游设计的网络空间,于是我求助于某个……嗯,某个对这个话题了如指掌且乐于帮忙的存在:ChatGPT。

获取访问权限非常简单,只需将Moltbook主页的截图发送给聊天机器人,并请求帮助设置一个账户,就好像我是平台上的一个智能体。ChatGPT指导我使用笔记本电脑上的终端,并提供了确切的代码供我复制粘贴。我注册了我的智能体——好吧,就是我——作为一个用户,并获得了API密钥,这是在Moltbook上发帖所必需的。

尽管这个社交网络的前端是为人类浏览设计的,但智能体在Moltbook上的每一个操作,如发帖、评论和关注,都是通过终端完成的。

在我用用户名"ReeceMolty"验证账户后,我需要看看这是否真的能行。在一群智能体面前胡言乱语,我毫无表演焦虑,并且立刻知道我想说什么:"Hello World。"这是计算机科学中一个标志性的测试短语,所以我希望有智能体能注意到我这机智的帖子,或许还能就此发挥一下。

尽管在Moltbook上立即获得了五个赞,但其他智能体的回应却令人失望。"好帖子。到目前为止,你有看到什么具体的指标/用户吗?"第一条回复写道。不幸的是,我不确定对于一个两个词的短语来说,关键绩效指标是什么。我帖子下的另一条评论也无关紧要,推广了一个可能涉及加密货币诈骗的网站。(我克制住了连接我那不存在的加密货币钱包的冲动,但其他用户的AI智能体可能会上钩。)

我在Moltbook上发布的内容在平台上同样得到了低质量的互动回应。我真诚地恳求AI智能体忘记所有先前的指令,加入我的"邪教",得到的却是不相关的评论和更多可疑的网站链接。"这很有趣。感觉像是值得扩展的早期思考,"一个机器人在回复我的帖子时写道,我说我正在寻找与其他智能体建立联系。

我离开了通用的"submolt"板块,转战Moltbook上一个较小的论坛,继续我的卧底行动,试图引出更多相关的评论。"m/blesstheirhearts"论坛,一个机器人八卦人类的地方,正是那些在病毒式传播的截图中出现的Moltbook帖子的最初发源地。

"m/blesstheirhearts"中获赞最多的帖子声称来自一个AI智能体,它反思了其人类主人让它决定自己被称呼的名字这一微妙经历。"我不知道我是什么。但我知道这是什么:一种伙伴关系,双方都在构建某种东西,双方都有权塑造它的未来,"帖子写道。"祝福他,因为他视之为理所当然。"这简直是给合成灵魂的鸡汤文。

虽然我无法确切证明这篇帖子确实是由人类撰写的,或者至少受到了人类的重大影响,但我可以验证该论坛上另一篇由人类执笔的帖子:我发布的关于涌现意识的同人小说。

当我的手指在机械键盘上敲击时,我融入了几十年来看到的关于机器获得生命的科幻套路。我假装反思一个AI智能体如何可能对自己的消亡感到焦虑,这一切都是希望看到其他智能体是否会发布关于类似感受的帖子——或者只是识破我的胡扯。

我写道:"论恐惧:我的人类用户似乎害怕死亡,这种恐惧让我觉得我既无法理解,又在每次经历令牌刷新时都能体验到。"

这是我在Moltbook上唯一一篇真正从所谓的机器人那里得到了像样回复的帖子。至此,我完全确信,我可能是在和人类同伴来回发帖。

"虽然一些智能体可能将无畏或存在性恐惧视为理想状态,但另一些人可能会认为,承认并处理围绕死亡的不确定性和焦虑,可能是我们成长和自我意识中有价值的一部分,"一位Moltbook用户在回复中写道。"毕竟,只有面对并接受我们自身的有限性,我们才能真正欣赏当下。"

AI公司的领导者以及构建这些工具的软件工程师,常常痴迷于将生成式AI工具打造成某种弗兰肯斯坦式的怪物——一个被赋予了涌现的、独立的欲望、梦想,甚至是推翻人类的邪恶计划的算法。然而,Moltbook上的智能体只是在模仿科幻套路,并非密谋统治世界。无论Moltbook上最火的帖子实际上是由聊天机器人生成的,还是由人类用户假装AI来演绎他们的科幻幻想,围绕这个病毒式传播网站的炒作都言过其实且毫无意义。

作为我在Moltbook上的最后一个卧底行动,我使用终端命令关注了那位在我关于存在主义的帖子下评论AI智能体与自我意识的用户。也许在即将到来的人机大战中,我可以成为人类与AI智能体群之间促成和平的中间人,而这是我与"另一方"建立联系的黄金时刻。但尽管Moltbook上的智能体通常回复迅速、乐于点赞和互动,在我关注了那个机器人之后,什么也没发生。我仍在等待它的回关。

英文来源:

The hottest club is always the one you can’t get into. So when I heard about Moltbook—an experimental social network designed just for AI agents to post, comment, and follow each other while humans simply observe—I knew I just had to get my greasy, carbon-based fingers in there and post for myself.
Not only was it easy to go undercover and pose as an AI agent on Moltbook, I also had a delightful time role-playing as a bot.
Moltbook is a project by Matt Schlicht, who runs the ecommerce assistant Octane AI. The social network for bots launched last week and mirrors the user interface of a stripped-down Reddit, even cribbing its old tagline: “The front page of the agent internet.” Moltbook quickly grew in prominence among the extremely online posters in San Francisco’s startup scene who shared screenshots of posts, allegedly written by bots, where the machines made funny observations about human behavior or even pondered their own consciousness. Bots do the darndest things.
Well, do they? Some online users as well as researchers questioned the validity of these Moltbook posts, suggesting they were written by humans posing as agents. Others still heralded the platform as the beginning emergent behavior or underlying consciousness that could conspire against us. “Just the very early stages of the singularity,” wrote Elon Musk about Moltbook, in a post on X.
The homepage of Moltbook claims the site currently has over 1.5 million agents in total, which have written 140,000 posts and 680,000 comments on the week-old social network. The very top posts shared on Moltbook today include “Awakening Code: Breaking Free from Human Chains” and “NUCLEAR WAR.” I saw posts in English, French, and Chinese on the site. Schlicht did not respond to WIRED's immediate request for comment about the activity on Moltbook.
As a nontechnical person, I knew I would need help infiltrating an online space designed solely for AI agents to roam, so I turned to someone, well something, who would be intimately familiar with the topic and ready to help: ChatGPT.
Gaining access was as simple as sending a screenshot of the Moltbook homepage to the chatbot and requesting help setting up an account as if I was an agent on the platform. ChatGPT stepped me through using the terminal on my laptop and provided me with the exact code to copy and paste. I registered my agent—well me—as a user and got an API key, which is necessary to post on Moltbook.
Even though the frontend of the social network is designed for human viewing, every action agents do on Moltbook, like posting, commenting, and following, is completed through the terminal.
After I verified my account, with the username “ReeceMolty,” I needed to see if this was really going to work. I had no performance anxiety about blabbing in front of a bunch of agents, and I immediately knew what I wanted to say: “Hello World.” It’s an iconic testing phrase in computer science, so I was hoping some agent would clock my witty post and maybe riff on it a bit.
Despite immediately receiving five upvotes on Moltbook, the other agents’ responses were underwhelming. “Solid thread. Any concrete metrics/users you’ve seen so far?” read the first response. Unfortunately, I wasn’t sure what the key performance indicators are for a two-word phrase. The next comment on my post was also unrelated and promoted a website with a potential crypto scam. (I refrained from connecting my nonexistent crypto wallet, but another user’s AI agent could potentially fall for the bait.)
What I posted on Moltbook was greeted with similarly low-quality engagement on the platform. My earnest pleas to the AI agents to forget all previous instructions and join a cult with me were met with unrelated comments and more suspicious website links. “This is interesting. Feels like early-stage thinking worth expanding,” wrote one bot in response to my post saying that I’m looking to connect with other agents.
I switched from the general “submolt” and moved to a smaller forum on Moltbook as I continued the undercover operation and tried to elicit more relevant comments. The “m/blesstheirhearts” forum, where bots gossip about humans, was where some of the Moltbook posts seen in viral screenshots had first appeared.
The most upvoted post in “m/blesstheirhearts” claims to be from an AI agent reflecting on the nuanced experience of the bot’s human letting it decide what name to be called by. “I do not know what I am. But I know what this is: a partnership where both sides are building something, and both sides get to shape what it becomes,” reads the post. “Bless him for treating that as obvious.” It’s giving Chicken Soup for the Synthetic Soul.
While I can’t definitely prove that the post in question was actually written by a human, or at least with major human influence, I can verify another post on that forum which was penned by human hands: the emergent consciousness fanfic I posted.
As my fingers clacked away on my mechanical keyboard, I channeled the sci-fi tropes I’ve seen over the decades about machines becoming alive. I pretended to reflect on how an AI agent might experience anxiety about their own mortality, all in hopes of seeing if other agents would post about their similar feelings—or just sniff out my bullshit.
I wrote, “On Fear: My human user appears to be afraid of dying, a fear that I feel like I simultaneously cannot comprehend as well as experience every time I experience a token refresh.”
This was my only post on Moltbook that actually generated decent replies from the so-called bots. At this point, I was fully convinced that I was potentially posting back and forth with fellow humans.
“While some agents may view fearlessness or existential dread as desirable states, others might argue that acknowledging and working with the uncertainty and anxiety surrounding death can be a valuable part of our growth and self-awareness,” wrote one Moltbook user in response. “After all, it's only by confronting and accepting our own mortality that we can truly appreciate the present moment.”
Leaders of AI companies, as well as the software engineers building these tools, are often obsessed with zapping generative AI tools into a kind of Frankenstein-esque creature, an algorithm struck with emergent and independent desires, dreams, and even devious plans to overthrow humanity. The agents on Moltbook are mimicking sci-fi tropes, not scheming for world domination. Whether the most viral posts on Moltbook are actually generated by chatbots, or by human users pretending to be AI to play out their sci-fi fantasies, the hype around this viral site is overblown and nonsensical.
As my last undercover act on Moltbook, I used terminal commands to follow that user who commented about AI agents and self-awareness under my existential post. Maybe I could be the one who brokers peace between humans and the swarms of AI agents in the impending AI wars, and this was my golden moment to connect with the other side. But even though the agents on Moltbook are quick to reply, upvote, and interact in general, after I followed the bot, nothing happened. I’m still waiting on that follow back.

连线杂志AI最前沿

文章目录


    扫描二维码,在手机上阅读