内容来源：https://www.engadget.com/home/ring-calls-off-partnership-with-police-surveillance-provider-flock-safety-031717605.html?src=rss

内容总结：

智能门铃制造商Ring近日宣布，已终止与警务监控平台Flock Safety的合作计划。该公司在声明中表示，此项合作“所需投入的时间和资源远超预期”，双方经协商共同决定终止合作，且该集成功能从未正式上线，未有任何用户视频数据通过此渠道传输。

根据原计划，警方可通过Flock平台向特定区域内的Ring用户发起视频调取请求，用户可自主选择是否匿名提供相关时段的门铃录像。Ring强调，该流程始终遵循用户自愿原则。

此次合作原本标志着Ring在调整执法合作策略后重新加强与警方联动。此前，Ring曾因在未获法庭许可或用户明确同意的情况下向执法机构提供视频而引发争议，并于2024年承诺停止此类行为。而Flock Safety因其自动车牌识别系统及无需搜查令即可调取的集中化数据库，长期面临隐私保护方面的质疑。

值得关注的是，Ring近期因在“超级碗”广告中推广其“寻宠派对”AI识别功能遭遇舆论压力。尽管该功能旨在协助寻找走失宠物，但公众担忧其可能加剧监控滥用风险，导致部分用户选择直接关闭相关功能。行业观察指出，此次合作终止虽以资源投入为由，但公众对隐私保护的强烈关注或是更深层的影响因素。

中文翻译：

智能门铃制造商Ring宣布终止与警方监控服务商Flock Safety的合作关系。该公司表示，这项合作所需投入的资源远超预期。

在因超级碗广告宣传其"搜寻派对"功能而引发舆论反弹后，Ring正式取消了与Flock Safety的合作。回顾2025年10月，Ring曾宣布与这家监控公司建立合作关系，该合作将使执法部门能够向智能门铃用户调取设备录制的视频。在最新声明中，该公司表示"原定的Flock Safety整合计划所需的时间和资源远超预期"。Ring补充说明，终止合作是双方共同决定，且Flock Safety的整合功能从未上线，目前没有任何Ring用户视频被传送至该公司。

根据原定合作方案，使用Flock Nova平台或FlockOS系统的执法机构本可通过Ring的社区请求功能向用户调取门铃录像。执法部门需提供事件发生地点、时间范围、专属调查代码及调查事项详情，相关请求随后会转发给对应区域用户，由用户自主决定是否分享录像。Ring曾承诺整个流程将保持匿名且完全自愿。

公开记录显示，Ring过去至少11次在未经法庭许可或设备主人同意的情况下，向执法部门分享安防摄像头视频。2024年该公司似乎调整了亲执法立场，宣布将停止在无搜查令的情况下向警方提供视频。此次与Flock的合作本标志着该公司在疏远执法部门后重新转向警方协作。Flock以自动车牌识别系统闻名，其将收集的信息集中存储于数据库，警方无需搜查令即可查询。虽然执法部门声称该系统有助于侦破绑架等案件，但404Media去年披露，美国移民海关执法局已以移民相关理由使用该数据库。

尽管Ring官方解释终止合作是因资源投入问题，但值得注意的是该公司近期因其超级碗"搜寻派对"广告遭受批评。该广告宣传通过摄像头AI识别视野内宠物，并整合多方影像寻找走失宠物。虽然该功能去年就已推出，但广告引发了对监控技术可能被滥用的担忧，导致许多用户直接关闭了该功能。

英文来源：

Ring calls off partnership with police surveillance provider Flock Safety
The company said the partnership would require more resources than anticipated.
Ring has canceled its partnership with Flock Safety, after receiving backlash for running a Super Bowl ad touting its Search Party feature. If you’ll recall, Ring revealed back in October 2025 that it was entering a partnership with the surveillance company, which would make it possible for law enforcement to ask smart doorbell owners for videos captured by their devices. In its announcement, the company said that the “planned Flock Safety integration would require significantly more time and resources than anticipated.” The decision to call off the partnership was mutual, Ring added, and Flock Safety’s integration was never launched. Apparently, no Ring customer footage was ever sent to Flock.
Under the partnership, law enforcement agencies using Flock's Nova platform or FlockOS would have been able to use Ring’s Community Requests to ask for doorbell videos from users. They would have been asked to specify the location and timeframe of the incident, as well as provide a unique investigation code and the details about what is being investigated. Their requests would then be forwarded to relevant users, who could choose to share footage from their doorbell. Ring said the whole process would have been anonymous and optional.
Ring was known to have shared security cam videos to law enforcement without a court order or the device owner’s consent at least 11 times in the past. In 2024, however, it seemed to have walked back its police-friendly stance and said that it would stop sharing videos with the police without a warrant. This alliance with Flock would have marked a return to police collaboration after the company distanced itself from law enforcement. Flock is known for its automatic license plate readers and for centralizing the information it collects into a database that police can search without a warrant. While law enforcement says the system can help them solve crimes like kidnapping. 404Media reported last year that ICE has been using the database, citing immigration-related reasons.
While Ring’s official reason was that the Flock partnership would need more resources than expected, it’s worth noting that the company recently got flak for its Super Bowl Search Party ad. Ring touted it as a way to find lost dogs by using its cameras’ AI to identify pets running across their field of vision and then pooling feeds together to identify missing pets. While Search Party isn’t new and was announced last year, the ad sparked concerns about surveillance and how the tech could be misused, leading users to disable the feature for their cameras altogether.