内容来源：https://www.engadget.com/social-media/mark-zuckerberg-testifies-in-social-media-addiction-trial-that-meta-just-wants-instagram-to-be-useful-234332316.html?src=rss

内容总结：

在社交媒体成瘾诉讼案庭审中，Meta首席执行官马克·扎克伯格于周三出庭作证。面对多起指控其平台对青少年造成伤害的诉讼，扎克伯格在法庭上多次强调，公司目标是让Instagram变得“有用”，而非刻意延长用户使用时间。

此次审理的案件源于一名加州女性提起的诉讼，她声称自己在未成年时期因使用Instagram等社交平台受到伤害。庭审中，扎克伯格被问及公司内部文件曾将“提升用户参与度”列为目标，但他辩称公司已转向“以实用性为核心”。当原告律师引用其过往公开言论时，扎克伯格多次指责对方“曲解原意”。

值得注意的是，扎克伯格出庭当日，其随行人员佩戴的Meta智能眼镜引发法庭关注。主审法官当庭警告禁止使用此类设备记录庭审过程，尤其担忧陪审团成员被拍摄或面临面部识别风险。尽管目前该产品不具备原生人脸识别功能，但相关技术动向已引发法律界警觉。

此案被视为Meta应对“社交媒体成瘾”指控的关键战役。除本案外，新墨西哥州等地也有类似诉讼进行中。Meta方面始终否认其平台具有临床意义上的成瘾性，公司高管此前亦曾作类似陈述。随着多州诉讼持续推进，科技平台对青少年心理健康的影响正成为司法聚焦的重点领域。

中文翻译：

在社交媒体成瘾案庭审中，马克·扎克伯格作证称Meta仅希望Instagram"实用化"。该公司始终试图淡化其应用可能致瘾的说法。

马克·扎克伯格周三就社交媒体成瘾案出庭作证，这场备受瞩目的陪审团审判吸引了广泛关注。据美国全国广播公司报道，这位脸书创始人在被描述为"充满对抗性"的庭审中表示，Meta的目标是让Instagram变得"实用"，而非延长用户使用时长。

据美国消费者新闻与商业频道报道，扎克伯格在证人席上被问及一份公司内部文件，其中将提升用户参与度列为"公司目标"。但美联社指出，扎克伯格声称公司已"有意识地调整方向，不再侧重这些目标，转而聚焦实用性"。他辩称："如果产品具有价值，人们自然会因其实用性而增加使用频率。"

本案源于一位在法庭文件中化名为"KGM"的加州女性提起的诉讼。现年20岁的原告指控自己童年时期受到Instagram、YouTube、Snapchat和TikTok成瘾性功能侵害。TikTok与Snapchat在开庭前已选择达成和解。

扎克伯格还被问及过往公开言论，包括去年他在乔·罗根播客节目中关于"因掌握多数投票权而不会被Meta董事会解雇"的表述。据《纽约时报》报道，扎克伯格当庭十余次指控原告律师"曲解"其历史言论。

扎克伯格出庭期间还引发了一段插曲——法官当庭警告旁听人员不得使用智能眼镜记录庭审过程。美国消费者新闻与商业频道注意到，当这位首席执行官步入法院时，其随行人员佩戴着Meta智能眼镜。虽无法确认是否有人在法庭内实际使用该设备，但法律事务记者梅根·库尼夫报道称，法官特别担忧陪审员可能被录音或遭面部识别。（目前Meta智能眼镜尚未内置面部识别功能，但近期报道表明该公司正考虑添加此项技术。）

此次洛杉矶庭审备受关注，不仅因为扎克伯格罕见亲自出庭，更因其标志着Meta将面临多起指控其平台危害儿童案件的开端。在本案及新墨西哥州的另一起诉讼中，Meta律师团队均对"社交媒体应被认定为真正成瘾行为"的观点提出质疑。Instagram负责人亚当·莫塞里此前在同一洛杉矶庭审中作证称，Instagram"在临床意义上并不具成瘾性"。

英文来源：

Mark Zuckerberg testifies in social media addiction trial that Meta just wants Instagram to be 'useful'
The company has tried to downplay the idea that its apps can be addictive.
Mark Zuckerberg took the stand Wednesday in a high-profile jury trial over social media addiction. In an appearance that was described by NBC News as "combative," the Facebook founder reportedly said that Meta's goal was to make Instagram "useful" not increase the time users are spending in the app.
On the stand, Zuckerberg was questioned about a company document that said improving engagement was among "company goals," according to CNBC. But Zuckerberg claimed that the company had "made the conscious decision to move away from those goals, focusing instead on utility," according to The Associated Press. "If something is valuable, people will use it more because it’s useful to them,” he said.
The trial stems from a lawsuit brought by a California woman identified as "KGM" in court documents. The now 20-year-old alleges that she was harmed as a child by addictive features in Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and TikTok. TikTok and Snap opted to settle before the case went to trial.
Zuckerberg was also asked about previous public statements, including his remarks on Joe Rogan's podcast last year that he can't be fired by Meta's board because he controls a majority of the voting power. According to The New York Times, Zuckerberg accused the plaintiffs' lawyer of "mischaracterizing" his past comments more than a dozen times.
Zuckerberg's appearance in court also apparently prompted the judge to warn people in the courtroom not to record the proceedings using AI glasses. As CNBC notes, members of Zuckerberg's entourage were spotted wearing Meta's smart glasses as the CEO was escorted into the courthouse. It's unclear if anyone was actually using the glasses in court, but legal affairs journalist Meghann Cuniff reported that the judge was particularly concerned about the possibility of jurors being recorded or subjected to facial recognition. (Meta's smart glasses do not currently have native facial recognition abilities, but recent reports suggest the company is considering adding such features.)
The Los Angeles trial has been closely watched not just because it marked a rare in-court appearance for Zuckerberg. It's among the first of several cases where Meta will face allegations that its platforms have harmed children. In this case and in a separate proceeding in New Mexico, Meta's lawyers have cast doubt on the idea that social media should be considered a real addiction. Instagram chief Adam Mosseri previously testified in the same Los Angeles trial that Instagram isn't "clinically addictive."